Tyler v. Knowles et al
Plaintiff: Elonza Jesse Tyler
Defendant: Mike E Knowles and Lori Johnson
Case Number: 2:2008cv02222
Filed: September 19, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Alicemarie H. Stotler
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER signed by District Judge Otis D. Wright, II on 2/19/2014 DISMISSING CASE. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G)
November 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER signed by District Judge Otis D. Wright, II on 11/13/2012 ORDERING that the Court hereby REAFFIRMS its 35 Order declaring Elonza Jesse Tyler is a vexatious litigant; further, in light of the Court's substantive finding that Tyler's prior actions have been frivolous, the Court hereby ENJOINS Tyler from filing any new Eighth Amendment of ADA actions relating to his medical care, treatment, or accomodations without first seeking leave of the presiding judge to do so; Finally, as a condition to maintain the present action, Tyler must file a security in the amount of $850.00 for the benefit of defendants in this action; this action is STAYED pending proof that such security has been furnished. (Waggoner, D)
June 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER signed by District Judge Otis D. Wright, II, on 6/24/11, ORDERING that 44 defendants' motion to dismiss this case is GRANTED, and this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintff's 43 motion for relief from judgment, is DENIED. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
March 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER signed by District Judge Otis D. Wright, II on 03/24/11 ORDERING that if plaintiff is desirous of pursuing this action, it is ordered that the security in the sum of $850 pursuant to 35 Order, be furnished to the clerk of the court by April 14, 2011 or this action will be dismissed. (Williams, D)
January 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER DENYING 34 Motion for Summary Adjudication signed by District Judge Otis D. Wright, II on 12/29/2010. (Matson, R)
September 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by District Judge Otis D. Wright, II on 9/20/10, ORDERING dfts to serve and file responsive pleadings within 30 days of this Order. (Kastilahn, A)
October 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by District Judge Otis D. Wright, II on 10/6/2009 DENYING 13 Motion to Stay. (Suttles, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tyler v. Knowles et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elonza Jesse Tyler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike E Knowles
Represented By: Lily Anne Korman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lori Johnson
Represented By: Lily Anne Korman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?