Mitchell v. Sanders et al
Roderick L Mitchell |
Roxanne Sanders, Manuel Sabin, M Whitney, Joseph A. Bick, R L Andreason and N. Grannis |
2:2008cv02284 |
September 29, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Solano |
Craig M. Kellison |
Craig M. Kellison |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 8/20/10 ORDERING the findings and recommendations 24 filed 7/13/10 ADOPTED IN FULL; dfts motion to dismiss 16 is granted; dft Whitney is dismissed from this action for failure to state aclaim and failure to serve; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K) |
Filing 24 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 07/12/10 recommending that defendants' motion to dismiss 16 be granted. Defendant Whitney be dismissed from this action for failure to state a claim and failure to serve. The clerk of the court be directed to enter judgment and close this case. MOTION to DISMISS 16 referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/13/09 ORDERING that plaintiff shall promptly seek additional information sufficient to effect service on any unserved defendants and notify the court once such information is ascertained. (Owen, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.