Yasin v. Coulter, et al.,
| Bilal Abdul Yasin |
| Chad Coulter, Alba Espinoza, Joe Galvan, Roman Alvarez, Federal Bureau of Investigation and California Alcohol Beverage Control Board |
| 2:2008cv02299 |
| September 29, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Butte |
| Frank C. Damrell |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Plaintiff |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 48:1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr., on 9/8/09. Pltf's motion for a continuance to permit time for discovery is DENIED. Dft Coulter's 24 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED on the ground that pltf's claims against him are barred by the statute of limitations. The case remains pending against the other named dfts, Espinoza, Galvan and Alvarez. Pltf has 90 days from the date of this Order to effectuate service on said dfts or the court will dismiss the action for a failure to timely serve. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 01/16/2009 ORDERING Defendant California Alcohol Beverage Control Board's Motion to Dismiss 8 GRANTED without prejudice. (Streeter, J) Modified on 1/20/2009 (Streeter, J). Modified on 1/20/2009 (Krueger, M).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
