United States of America v. Real Property Located at 22 Nelsier Place, Oroville, California
| United States of America |
| Real Property Located at 22 Nelsier Place, Oroville, California |
| 2:2008cv02326 |
| October 1, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| None |
| U.S. Government Plaintiff |
| 21:881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
STIPULATION and ORDER FOR Dismissal with prejudice and Order Certificate of Reasonable Cause signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/22/2010. Civil Case Terminated. CASE CLOSED. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 05/27/10 ORDERING that counsel for claimant Rebecca Gale Powell to Show Cause in writing w/i 14 days why sanctions of $150 should not issue in the above-captioned case, as permitted by LR 110, for failure to appear at 05/17/10 scheduling conference. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
38
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/17/09 ORDERING this matter is STAYED until 03/01/10; The parties will advise the court at least 10 days prior to 03/01/10 whether a further stay is necessary. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
31
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/1/09 ORDERING that the action denominated CIV. NO. S-09-684 WBS/KJM is REASSIGNED to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton and Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows for all further proceedings. The caption on all documents filed in the REASSIGNED case shall be shown as CIV. NO. S-09-684 LKK/GGH. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
27
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/23/2009 ORDERING Related with case(s) 2:08cr453 LKK, 2:08cr518 GEB, 2:08cv2309 LKK GGH, 2:08cv2326 LKK GGH; Case 2:08cr518 GEB is REASSIGNED to Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton for all further proceedings; Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr no longer assigned to case.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
23
[DISREGARD - Docketed in incorrect case] ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/9/09 ORDERING that this case is STAYED until 7/5/09. The parties will advise the court at least 10 days prior to 7/5/09, whether a further stay is necessary. The scheduling conference scheduled for 1/20/09 is VACATED. (Engbretson, K.) Modified on 1/12/2009 (Engbretson, K.).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Real Property Located at 22 Nelsier Place, Oroville, California | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Kristin S Door |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Real Property Located at 22 Nelsier Place, Oroville, California | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
