Williams v. Department of Motor Vehicles et al
| Eric G. Williams |
| Department of Motor Vehicles, Cathy H. Rho, Vanessa Perry, Solano County Probation Department, San Francisco Sheriffs Dept, O'Malley, SIU and San Francisco Police Department |
| 2:2008cv02348 |
| October 3, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/12/10 ORDERING the findings and recommendations 17 ADOPTED IN FULL; this action is DISMISSED; CASE CLOSED.(Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
17
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/11/2010 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
14
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/12/10 recommending that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/6/09 ORDERING that 7 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; 10 Motion to Compel is DENIED as premature. Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend within 60 days.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
