Keszler, et al v. First Horizon Home Loan Corporation
| Jennifer Cutts Keszler and Robert Keszler |
| First Horizon Home Loans |
| 2:2008cv02359 |
| October 3, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Contract: Other Office |
| El Dorado |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1), signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/23/09. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
14
[DISREGARD - REFER TO 16 SCHEDULING ORDER AS ORIGINAL] STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/22/09 ORDERING that Discovery ddl 10/20/2009; Dispositive Motion Hearing ddl 12/20/2009. Final Pretrial Confe rence set for 3/22/2010 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Bench Trial set for 6/15/2010 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Case Referred to VDRP. (Duong, D) Modified on 1/22/2009 (Marciel, M).
|
|
Filing
13
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/20/09 re 10 ORDERING that plaintiffs shall have up to and including January 16, 2009, to file their responsive pleading to First Horizon's 6 counterclaim in this matter.(Duong, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
