Phillippi v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
Adam Phillippi |
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, AstraZeneca LP, Zeneca Holdings Inc., McKinley Medical, LLC, Moog, Inc., Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation and I-Flow Corporation |
2:2008cv02445 |
October 15, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability Office |
Sacramento |
Gregory G. Hollows |
John A. Mendez |
Both |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 111 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/30/10 ORDERING that defts are awarded $18,206.95 in costs. Execution of this award is stayed until final resolution of the pending appeal before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Owen, K) |
Filing 100 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/19/10 ORDERING that defendants may file an amended cost bill no later than 7/21/10, and Plaintiff may file objections thereto no later than 7/23/10. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 94 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/30/10 ORDERING that Deft's 67 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; Sanctions in the amount of $500 against Ms. O'Leary are due within 10 days of the court's order. Additionally, Mr. Powers is sanctioned in the amount of $200 and payment is due within 10 days of the court's order. CASE CLOSED. (Owen, K) |
Filing 85 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/7/10 ORDERING that Deft Stryker may file UNDER SEAL Reply to Pltf's Opposition to Stryker's Motion for Summary Judgment; Reply to Responses to Separate Statement; and Evidentiary Objections. (Owen, K) |
Filing 76 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/3/2010 GRANTING stipulated 74 Motion to Seal. Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment, Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts, and Declaration of Leslie W. O'Leary in support (w/Exhibits) shall be filed UNDER SEAL. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 71 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/25/10: Exhibits A through Z to 69 Declaration of Wayne A. Wolff In Support of Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed under seal. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 62 CORRECTED MDL ORDER DENYING TRANSFER re: 61 Order on Motion to Consolidate Cases. (Waggoner, D) |
Filing 61 MDL ORDER DENYING TRANSFER re: 48 Motion. (Donati, J) |
Filing 57 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/2/10 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court REFER this case to another available US Magistrate Judge for any further proceedings which may be appropriate. (Carlos, K) |
Filing 50 [DISREGARD] duplicate-ORDER. (Becknal, R). |
Filing 43 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/14/09 ORDERING that this action is related to 2:09-cv-2018 FCD EFB.(Duong, D) |
Filing 41 RELATED ORDER 40 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/6/2009. The action denominated 2:09-CV-1509 WBS KJM is REASSIGNED to Judge Mendez and Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows for all further proceedings. Henceforth, caption on documents filed shall be shown as 2:09-CV-1509 JAM GGH and Clerk shall make appropriate adjustment to compensate for reassignment. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 36 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/4/2009 GRANTING 35 Stipulated Order of dismissal without prejudice of defendants AstraZeneca LP, Zeneca Holdings Inc., and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP. (Matson, R) |
Filing 30 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/02/2009 re 29 ORDERING that this action is dismissed without prejudice as to McKinley Medical, LLC and Moog, Inc. (Duong, D) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.