Brooks v. Felker
Plaintiff: Steven D Brooks
Defendant: T. Felker
Case Number: 2:2008cv02512
Filed: October 22, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Lassen
Presiding Judge: Frank C. Damrell
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 118 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/14/2013 DISMISSING CASE, with prejudice, pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G)
May 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 114 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/8/2013 GRANTING defendants' 113 motion; and the dispositive motions deadline is VACATED, and will be reset, if appropriate, following the 6/14/13 settlement conference. (Yin, K)
April 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 112 ORDER AND WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/16/2013 ORDERING the custodian to produce Steven Dexter Brooks #K-16234, to testify in USDC at 9:30 AM on 6/14/2013 in courtroom #24, before M agistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney; custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ; and the clerk to serve a copy of this order and writ on the Out-to-Court Desk and Warden of ASP. (cc: OTCD-SAC)(Yin, K)
March 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 109 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/11/13 ordering defendants' 02/06/13 motion 108 is granted. The dispositive motion filing deadline is extended from 02/28/13 to 04/29/13. (Plummer, M)
September 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/24/12 ORDERING that 104 Motion for Extension of time is GRANTED; Defendants shall prepare and serve their discovery responses on or before November 5, 2012; The June 14, 2012 scheduling order is revised as follows: Plaintiff is granted twenty-one days from receipt of the discovery responses to file a motion to compel discovery as to those responses, if necessary; and the dispositive motions filing deadline is extended from January 13, 2013, to February 28, 2013. In all other respects, the June 14, 2012 scheduling order remains in effect.(Dillon, M)
October 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/12/11 ordering plaintiff's 10/05/11 request to withdraw his motion to amend, which this court determined was incomplete 87 is denied. The 07/08/11 request for judicial notice 80 filed by defendants is granted. Plaintiff's 06/20/11 motion to amend 77 is denied without prejudice. Within 21 days from the date of this order, defendants shall provide plaintiff with the names of those Facility C and Facility D Captains at HDSP in 2004 and 2005 as set forth above. 21 days after defendants provide plaintiff with facility captain names, plaintiff may renew his motion to amend, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint, entitled "Third Amended Complaint." (Plummer, M)
September 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/22/11 GRANTING 85 Motion for protective order; Defendants may redact all photographs of inmate- manufactured weapons and the names, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation numbers, and other information that could reveal the identity of the confidential informants from the lockdown memoranda responsive to Plaintiffs request for production of documents.(Dillon, M)
July 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/25/11 ordering defendants' motion for extension of time to provide their supplemental response to plaintiff's request for production of documents 75 is granted. Defendants shall pr ovide the supplemental response on or before 08/15/11. Plaintiff's motion to vacate the scheduling order 76 is denied without prejudice. The dispositive motion deadline is vacated and will be re-set, if appropriate, once the court rules on plaintiff's motion to amend. (Plummer, M)
June 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/7/11 DENYING 55 Motion for sanctions based on spoilation of evidence. (Dillon, M)
May 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/31/11 DENYING 58 Motion for Leave to file Second 25 Amended Complaint filed by Steven Dexter Brooks. (Meuleman, A)
April 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER AND REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/20/2011 ORDERING Defendants 65 motion to modify the scheduling order is PARTIALLY GRANTED; pltf's 50 motion for extention of time to file pretrial motions i s PARTIALLY GRANTED; dfts shall respond to pltf's 58 motion to amend on or before 4/29/2011; pltf's reply, if any, shall be filed 7 days thereafter; pretrial motions shall be filed by 6/30/2011; the parties are relieved of their obligation to file pretrial statements; the Trial Confirmation hearing and Jury Trial are VACATED; and pltf's 57 motion in limine is DENIED without prejudice. (Reader, L) Modified on 4/20/2011 (Reader, L).
March 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/11/2011 DENYING pltf's 51 request for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
August 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER and REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/11/10 ORDERING that 42 Motion for Extension is partially granted. The 6/23/10 scheduling order is revised as follows: the discovery deadline is continued to 12/28/10; and the pretrial motions deadline is continued to 2/28/11.(Dillon, M)
May 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/3/10 DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT SERVICE DOCUMENTS and USM-285 Forms within 30 days. Service is appropriate for D.L. Runnels, R.K. Wong, R.G. Johnson. Clerk to send plaintiff: 1 Summons, 3 U SM-285 Forms, and 1 copy of the Amended Complaint filed on 2/3/10. Plaintiff's 24 Motion to Amend the Complaint is GRANTED; 30 Motion for sanctions is DENIED as moot; 31 Motion to extend discovery deadline is DENIED as moot; 20 Discovery and Scheduling Order is VACATED.(Dillon, M)
February 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/12/2010 ORDERING that w/in 14 days, dft Felker to pay the USM the sum of $103.62, unless w/in that time he files a written statement showing good cause for failure to waive service; the clerk to serve a copy of this order on the USM. (cc: USM)(Yin, K)
November 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 DISCOVERY and SCHEDULING ORDER: signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/16/09 Discovery due by 3/12/2010. Motions to amend the complaint shall be filed no later than 03/12/10. Dispositive Motions due by 5/7/2010. (Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brooks v. Felker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven D Brooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Felker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?