Ingram v. Sacramento City Police Department et al
Chaderick A. Ingram |
Sacramento City Police Department and Gary L Dahl |
2:2008cv02547 |
October 24, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Lawrence K. Karlton |
Defendant |
Federal Question |
28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONSsigned by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/11/10: IT IS ORDERED the status conference set for 5/19/10 is VACATED; IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed and the Clerk of the Court be directed to close this case. REFERRED to Lawrence K. Karlton.(Carlos, K) |
Filing 70 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/23/10 ORDERING the findings and recommendations 61 are ADOPTED; pltf's 53 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. (Carlos, K) |
Filing 61 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/23/2009 ORDERING Plaintiff's 59 , 60 , request for a "Hearing for Findings and Conclusions and Judgment on Partial Findings, Pursuant to FRCP 52,&qu ot; is DENIED. Plt's 8 application to proceed in this action in forma pauperis, is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue forthwith all process pursuant to FRCP 4 for the Sacramento Police Dept. The Clerk of Court shall send pltf the aforementioned summons, along with one USM-285 form, a copy of the 10/5/2009 amended complaint, this order, the forms providing notice of the magistrate judge's availability to exercise jurisdiction for all purposes and the court's VDR P, and a copy of this court's Local Rules. Pltf shall supply the Marshal, within 15 days from the date this order is filed, all information needed by the Marshal to effect service of process on the Sacramento Police Dept, and shall, within 10 da ys thereafter, file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the Marshal. The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this order on the USM. Status Conference set for 3/17/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (EFB) before Magist rate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. On or before 3/3/2010, the parties shall file a status report. RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 53 be denied; Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections due 10 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L) |
Filing 52 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/2/09 ORDERING that Pltf's 47 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as moot. (Engbretson, K.) |
Filing 48 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 09/04/09 ORDERING that plaintiff's numerous filings, Dckt. Nos. 20, 22-23, 25-29, 31, 33-43, 45-46, shall be construed as statments of opposition to defendant 39;s motion to dismiss; and the Clerk shall remove from the docket any designation or symbol as to these documents that indicates the necessity of further action by the court. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint be granted in part and denied in part and that plaintiff be granted leave to file a second amended complaint which better articulates plaintiff's claims. Objections to F and R's are due within 10 days.(Streeter, J) |
Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/21/2009 ORDERING 6 MOTION to DISMISS is denied as moot; the order to show cause is discharged; the action shall proceed on the amended complaint; and dfts shall have 20 days after the filing date of this order to file a responsive pleading to the amended complaint which may include a new motion. (Matson, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.