Barboza v. California Association of Professional Firefighters, Long-Term Disability Plan et al
David Barboza |
California Association of Professional Firefighters, Long-Term Disability Plan, California Administration Insurance Services, Inc., Kenneth Blanton, Dennis Campanale, Gene Dangel, James - Floyd, Charles Gluck, Brian Pinomaki, William Soqui and California Association of Professional Firefighters |
2:2008cv02569 |
October 28, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Gregory G. Hollows |
Lawrence K. Karlton |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 165 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/30/16. ORDERING that this Actin is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to a confidential settlement agreement, each party to bear its own attorney fees and cos ts. The Court makes a considered exception to its general rule and in this case retains jurisdiction of this matter for the purpose of resolving any dispute regarding the interpretation or enforcement of the settlement agreement between the parties. CASE CLOSED(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 126 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 4/6/11 ORDERING both plaintiff and defendants motions for fees are DENIED; Defendants' motion to alter or amend the judgment is denied; and because both parties prevailed on a portion of their motions for summary judgment, the court declines to award costs to either plaintiff or defendants.(Matson, R) |
Filing 96 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 1/25/2011 ORDERING Defendants motion for summary judgment is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part, and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part; dft s are ORDERED to distribute SARs from 2002 to date to all participants in accordance with 29 C.F.R. 2520.104b-10 and to obtain actuarial studies for each year that the plan has not undergone actuarial review; indemnity clause in CAPF and CAISI's administrative services agreement is declared void and unenforceable; for the reasons set forth, dfts' motion for sanctions is DENIED and pltf's cross-motion for sanctions is DENIED. This case is Closed; and the Clerk of Court is directed to Close this case. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L) |
Filing 90 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 10/27/10. Motion Hearing re-set for 12/3/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr as to 41 Motion for Summary Judgment ; 47 Motion for Summary Judgment ; 61 Motion for Sanctions; 69 Motion to Modify the pretrial scheduling order. (Williams, D) |
Filing 74 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 9/20/2010 GRANTING 73 Defendants' Request, and Defendants' Reply Brief in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication is extended to 16 pages. (Krueger, M) |
Filing 60 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 08/27/10 AMENDING the 16 Pretrial Scheduling Order: The Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing is reset for 10/22/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. Final Pretrial Conference reset for 1/21/2011 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. Bench Trial reset for 4/5/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. (Manzer, C) |
Filing 46 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 7/23/2010 ORDERING that the Pretrial Scheduling Order shall be amended to extend the last date to hear the parties' motions for summary judgment to 9/10/2010, and the last day for Dfts to file a motion for summary judgment will be 7/30/2010. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 39 STIPULATION and ORDER 38 for modification of 16 Pretrial Scheduling Order signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 4/27/2010. Expert Discovery date is EXTENDED to 6/25/2010. The last date for Dispositive Motions are not due 8/20/2010. Final Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED to 10/29/2010 at 02:00 PM and Trial has been CHANGED to 1/25/2011 at 09:00 AM. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/11/10, ORDERING that the joint statement SHALL BE FILED no later than seven days before the 1/28/10 hearing. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/11/10 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery, filed 12/3/09 19 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's counsel is permitted to use the actuarial reports and payment ledgers: in depositions of members of the Board of Directors, to discuss with his client as provided herein, and to consult with his actuary provided the actuary consultant/expert signs a non-disclosure agreement. On or before 1/19/2010 defendants shall file a confirmation statement that they have conducted a good faith search for all responsive documents and all such documents have been produced. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/4/2006 ORDERING that the joint statement deadline will be 12/31/2009. (Matson, R) |
Filing 18 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 17 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/5/09 with the following modication: Any request to seal a document(s) must demonstrate good cause for sealing, or in dispositive proceedings, compelling reasons to seal the document(s). See Pintos v. Pacific Creditors, 565 F.3d 1106, 1115-1116 (9th Cir. 2009). Modifies paragraph 10. (Kastilahn, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.