Jones et al v. DeForest
Malik Jones |
J. McGuire and M. DeForest |
2:2008cv02607 |
November 3, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Lassen |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 95 ORDER OF REFERRAL TO SETTLEMENT WEEK AND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/14/13. This Case is SET for a Settlement Conference on 6/14/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 94 ORDER denying 85 Motion to subpoena witnesses signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/06/13. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 87 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/24/13 ordering plaintiff's request for an extension of time to file a pretrial statement is granted. Plaintiff shall file a pretrial statement within 30 days of the date of this order. Defendant's pretrial statement is due within 14 days after service of plaintiff's pretrial statement. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 84 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/27/2012 ORDERING that plaintiff shall file a pretrial statement within 30 days or it will be recommended that this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the court's orders; defendant's pretrial statement is due within 14 days after service of plaintiff's pretrial statement.(Yin, K) |
Filing 83 ORDER adopting 79 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/20/12: The motion to dismiss 57 for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is GRANTED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. The motion for summary judgment 58 as to the claim that Defendant Lipton was deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff's serious medical need on September 13, 2007, is DENIED. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 81 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/11/12 ORDERING that plaintiff shall have 21 days from the date of this order to file additional evidentiary submissions if he wishes, but it is not required. No extensions of time will be given. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 79 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 06/21/12 ORDERING that the motion for clarification 74 is moot. Also, RECOMMENDING that the motion to dismiss 57 be granted for failure to exhaust administra tive remedies as to the following claims: (a) as to plaintiff's claim that defendant Bainbridge used excessive force on 09/21/07 (b) as to plaintiff's claim that Bainbridge used excessive force on 10/16/07; and (c) as to plaintiff's cl aim that defendants Follosoco and Lipton used excessive force on 11/06/07. The motion for summary judgment 58 be denied as to the claim that defendant Lipton was deliberately indifferent to plaintiff's serious medical need on 09/13/07. MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 58 referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 21 days.(Plummer, M) |
Filing 78 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/13/12 ordering the order to show cause 73 is discharged. The court finds the imposition of sanctions unwarranted. The hearing on the order to show cause, set for 04/04/12 is vacated. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 73 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/02/12 vacating 71 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Counsel for defendants Matthew Ross Wilson, shall, within 7 days of the date of this order, show cause why he should not be sanctioned for unnecessary delay and waste of judicial resources. The hearing on whether to impose sanctions is set for 04/04/12 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom 26. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 71 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/8/12 RECOMMENDING that The motion to dismiss 57 be granted in part and denied in part. It should be granted as to plaintiffs claim defendant Bainbridge used excessive f orce against him on September 21, 2007. It should be denied as to his claim that Bainbridge used excessive force on October 16, 2007. It should also be denied as to the claim that defendants Follosoco and Lipton used excessive force on November 6, 20 07; The motion for summary judgment 58 be granted in part and denied in part. It should be granted as to plaintiffs claim that defendants Follosoco and Lipton used excessive force against him on November 6, 2007. It should be denied as to the claim that defendant Bainbridge used excessive force on October 16, 2007. The motion should also be denied as to the claim that defendant Lipton was deliberately indifferent to a serious medical need on September 13, 2007. Motions referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 41 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/20/2010 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed w/out prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections due w/in 21 days.(Yin, K) |
Filing 35 ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/13/2010 re 34 ORDERING that upon reconsideration, the 33 order of the magistrate judge filed May 19, 2010, is AFFIRMED. Plaintiff is granted twenty days to submit the documents identified in the Magistrate Judge's May 19, 2010 order. (Duong, D) |
Filing 18 ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/17/09 ORDERING the court's 7/24/09 Order 14 is VACATED; and upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed 5/21/09 is AFFIRMED. (Carlos, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.