Luu v. Solano County Superior Court et al
| Quoc Xuong Luu |
| Solano County Superior Court, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation and State of California |
| 2:2008cv02630 |
| November 4, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Mandamus & Other Office |
| Solano |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/24/2011 RECOMMENDING that respondent's 59 motion to dismiss be granted; and this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due w/in 21 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 09/20/11 ordering that within 14 days petitioner file an opposition to respondents' pending motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/31/11 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 9/7/10 45 are ADOPED in full; Petitioner's MOTION to SET ASIDE the Court's Order of Amended Petition 36 is DENIED as MOOT. Petitioner's MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 44 is DENIED. The Court DECLINES to issue the Certificate of Appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
45
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 09/03/10 recommending that Petitioner's motion to set aside the court's order of amended petition 36 be denied as moot. Petitioner's request for a certificate of appealability 40 be denied. Petitioner's motion for summary judgment 44 be denied. Motions 36 , 40 and 44 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/04/09 ORDERING the motion to consolidate 17 is denied. The motion to compel discovery 18 is denied without prejudice. Also, RECOMMENDING that the motion to dismiss 21 be granted. The petitioner be granted 30 days after the adoption of these findings and recommendations in which to file an amended petition. The motion for summary judgment 27 be denied without prejudice. MOTION to DISMISS 21 and MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 27 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
