Secretary of Labor v. Couturier, et al.,
| Secretary of Labor |
| Clair R. Couturier, Jr., David R. Johanson, Johanson Berenson, LLP, Robert E. Eddy, James Roorda, Matthew Donnelly, Business Appraisal Institute, David L. Heald, Consulting Fiduciaries, Inc., The Employee Ownership Holding Corporation and The Employee Ownership Holding Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan |
| 2:2008cv02732 |
| November 13, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
| Sacramento |
| Maryland Unassigned |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 29:1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
209
FIRST ORDER AMENDING CONSENT JUDGMENT & ORDER BETWEEN THE SECRETARY AND DEFENDANTS DAVID R. JOHANSON AND JOHANSON BERENSON LLP, signed by District Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 3/1/16. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
201
ORDER APPOINTING INDEPENDENT FIDUCIARY. Signed by District Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 3/3/2010. (Short, Jan) Modified on 3/4/2010 to remove mailing notice to Mr. Eddy as he is represented by counsel. (Short, Jan).
|
|
Filing
195
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 2/8/2010 ORDERING TEOHC and the Plan are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why FCI should not be appointed as independent fiduciary. The Court would like to know about specific parties that might be appointed as a trustee or independent fiduciary, and what their services would cost. Suggestions for alternative trustees or independent fiduciaries must be made to the Court by 2/23/2010. (Engbretson, K.)
|
|
Filing
187
[DISREGARD, See #171] ORDER signed by District Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 1/26/10 GRANTING the 163 Motion for Consent Judgment as to Defendants Matthew Donnelly and Business Appraisal Institute. (Owen, K) Modified docket text on 1/27/2010 (Waggoner, D).
|
|
Filing
180
STIPULATION and ORDER Consolidating Cases for Settlement. (Short, Jan)
|
|
Filing
171
ORDER signed by District Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 10/13/09 ORDERING that the court finds that there is no just reason to delay the entry of this Consent Judgment & Order and, pursuant to Rule 54(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., expressly directs the entry thereof as a final Consent Judgment & Order. (Owen, K)
|
|
Filing
167
ORDER signed by District Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 9/16/09 ORDER that the 151 Motion to Strike is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (Engbretson, K.)
|
|
Filing
142
CONSENT JUDGMENT signed by District Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 7/14/09. (Gaydosh, J)
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER signed by District Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 07/07/09 ORDERING that 88 Motion to Strike filed by Secretary of Labor is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: with regard to Defendant Clair Couturier's Second, Third, Fourth, Fif th Sixth, Eighth, and Tenth Affirmative Defenses, the Secretary of Labor's Motion to Strike is GRANTED; with regard to the First and Ninth Affirmative Defenses, the Motion is DENIED. With regard to the Seventh Affirmative Defense, the Secy's Motion is DENIED, and Couturier's Request for Leave to Amend is GRANTED. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER signed by District Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 02/10/09 DENYING 37 Motion to Dismiss Count I of Amended Complaint; AND denying 15 MOTION to TRANSFER VENUE, or in the alternative, MOTION to DISMISS. (Streeter, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
