Hicks v. Walker et al
Plaintiff: Michael J Hicks
Defendant: Jimmie Walker, Linda Young, Michael Jaffe and Daniel Jackson
Case Number: 2:2008cv02844
Filed: November 24, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/17/09 DISMISSING CASE pursuant to FRCP 41(a). CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
October 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/20/2009 ORDERING that dfts notify this court, within 10 days, of any objections to dismissal of this action. (Suttles, J)
July 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/17/09 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations 15 are ADOPTED IN FULL; pltf's Motion for Reconsideration 14 is DENIED; dft Walker is DISMISSED from the action. (Carlos, K)
April 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/16/09 ORDERING that plaintiffs request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED; Plaintiff is obligated to pay the filing fee of $350.00 for this action,to be collected and paid in accordance with this courts order to the Director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation filed concurrently herewith. Plaintiff's 4 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Service of the amended complaint is appropriate for d efendants Grubb, Jackson, Jaffee and Young. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff four USM-285 forms, one summons, an instruction sheet and a copy of the amended complaint filed 12/24/08. Within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the appropriate documents to the court.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hicks v. Walker et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael J Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jimmie Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Linda Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Jaffe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?