Wyatt v. Walmart Inc., et al
| Victor Henderson Wyatt |
| Walmart Inc., Walmart Store and Martha Sharpe |
| 2:2008cv02902 |
| November 26, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Sacramento |
| Morrison C. England |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/18/10 ORDERING that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Given both Plaintiff's repeated attempts to amend his complaint and the force of Defendants' arguments in favor of dismissal, no further leave to amend will be permitted. The Clerk is directed to close the file. The Court's dismissal of Plaintiff's supplemental state law claims, however, is without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to litigate those claims in state court should he wish to do so. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/16/09 GRANTING 20 Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend; second amended complaint due within 20 days. (Owen, K)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/7/09 ORDERING that Dfts' 9 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with leave to amend. Pltf may file an amended complaint within 20 days. If no amended complaint is filed within 20 days this case will be dismissed without leave to amend. (Engbretson, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
