Bouyer et al v. GMAC Mortgage
Mitchell E. Bouyer, Sr. and Martha E. Bouyer |
GMAC Mortgage |
2:2008cv03022 |
December 12, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fraud or Truth-In-Lending Office |
San Mateo |
Garland E. Burrell |
Gregory G. Hollows |
None |
Federal Question |
31:3731 Fraud |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/17/09, RECOMMENDING that for the reasons set forth in the order and findings and recommendations filed September 3, 2009, and for plaintiffs failure to comply with that order, this action be dismissed with prejudice. Matter referred to Judge Burrell. Within 21 days after being served with these f&r's, plaintiffs may file written objections with the court. Any reply to objections shall be filed and served within 14 days after the objections are served. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 43 ORDER submitting 39 Motion to Dismiss and vacating the 12/10/09 hearing, signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/4/09. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 42 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/9/2009 ADOPTING 33 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; The claims of usury, abuse of process, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and trespass are dismissed with prejudice. (Matson, R) |
Filing 33 ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/2/2009 ORDERING the 19 order to show cause is discharged; 8 motion to set aside entry of default is granted; 7 motion for default judgment is denied as m oot; 12 motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part; and Plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint for fraud only, w/in 30 days of this order. IT IS RECOMMENDED that the claims of usury, abuse of process, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and trespass be dismissed with prejudice. (Matson, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.