Castillo v. Solano County Jail, et al
| Reynaldo Joshua Castillo |
| Solano County Jail and Solano County Medical |
| 2:2008cv03080 |
| December 19, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Solano |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/19/12 ORDERING that this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/3/12 ORDERING that therequest for an order permitting the filing of plaintiffs proposed Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to detach and separately file the Second Amended Complaint that is currently attached to the parties stipulation, striking the word proposed that is contained in the title of the complaint.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/22/2012 ORDERING plaintiff's attorney's request for authority to incur costs by appointed pro bono counsel Tania Colderbank is GRANTED. (Crouch, J)
|
|
Filing
88
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/22/2012, and agreed between the parties to EXTEND the time to file a joint status report to 10/2/2012. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
85
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/19/12 ordering the timed identified in the court's order dated 05/21/12 requiring that a joint status report be filed by 06/21/12 is now extended by 60 days so that the joint status report is now due on 08/21/12. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/21/12 ORDERING that counsel for the parties are directed to file, within 30 days after the filing date of this order, a joint status report.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/03/12 ordering Tania H. Colderbank is appointed as counsel in the above entitled matter. Tania H. Colderbank shall notify Sujean Park at 916-930-4278 or via email at spark@caed.uscourts.gov, if she has any questions related to the appointment. The clerk of the court shall serve a copy of this order upon Tania H. Colderbank, Colderbank law, 117 J Street, Ste 300, Sacramento, CA 95814. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/31/11 granting 78 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The clerk of court is directed to contact Sujean Park, Alternative Dispute Resolution Coordinator, for the purpose of locating forthwith an attorney admitted to practice in thic court who is willing to accept the appointment. (cc: ADR Director) (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER adopting in full 74 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 9/5/11. Plaintiff's motion to dismiss 67 is GRANTED; defendants Stanton, Dolan, Marsh, and Grapentine are DISMISSED from this action. Defend ant Solano County is DISMISSED from this action. The County's motion for summary judgment 65 is DENIED as MOOT. Defendants Kadevar and Pilaczynski's motion for summary judgment 60 is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART; plaintiff's claim for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs is dismissed; plaintiff's remaining failure to protect claim shall proceed to trial. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 71 is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
74
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/11/11 RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's 67 motion to dismiss be granted, and defendants Stanton, Dolan, Marsh, and Grapentine should be dismissed from this action; Defe ndant Solano County should be dismissed from this action; The motion for summary judgment 65 filed by the County defendants should be denied as moot; The motions for summary judgment 60 filed by defendants Kadevar and Pilaczynski, should be grant ed in part and denied in part; plaintiffs claim for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs should be dismissed; plaintiffs remaining failure to protect claim should proceed to trial; and Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment 71 shoul d be denied. Motions 60 , 65 , 67 , 71 and this case referred to Judge Burrell. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within 14 days after service of the objections. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/9/11 GRANTING 66 Motion for Extension; Plaintiff is granted 30 days to file and serve his opposition to 60 65 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER denying 55 Motion to Compel further discovery signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/04/10. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/6/10 ORDERING that pltf's 51 motion to compel is GRANTED in part; dfts (and/or CFMG), shall w/in 21 days, provide a comprehensive supplemental response to pltf's Request Nos. 6-11, as described in this order; and dft Pilaczynski (and/or CFMG) shall, w/in 21 days, respond to pltf's Request Nos. 19 and 20. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/5/2010 ORDERING Defendant Marsh shall, within 14 days after the filing date of this order, file and serve a response to plaintiff's 55 motion; plaintiff may, within 7 days after service of defendant's response, file a reply.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/10/10 ORDERING that the 29 motion for summary judgment prematurely filed by defendants Kadevari and Pilaczynski is VACATED without prejudice to the refiling of a dispositive motion after close of discovery; discovery deadline is extended to and including 10/15/10, and any motions to compel discovery shall be filed by 9/17/10; dispositive motion deadline is extended to and including 1/28/11; Plaintiffs 48 "Petition for the Courts As sistance in Obtaining Photographs" is GRANTED; the Warden at Mule Creek State Prison shall, within 21 days of the filing date of this order, accommodate plaintiffs request to take and obtain photographs of his body to the extent such photographs are relevant to the contentions set forth in plaintiffs Amended Complaint, subject to any reasonable conditions the Warden deems appropriate; Defendants Kadevari and Pilaczynski shall respond to plaintiffs 51 Motion toCompel Discovery within 21 da ys of the date they were served with the motion; Clerk of Court shall send plaintiff copies of the courts orders filed March 4, 2009 (Dkt. No. 16) and July 7, 2009 (Dkt. No. 25); the rules and procedures governing discovery and dispositive motions are set forth therein.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/31/10 ordering the parties shall within 14 days of the filing date of this order, file separate statements addressing whether any further discovery is warranted and, if so, specifically identifying the discovery which is sought and the period of time required to obtain such discovery. The court will thereafter set deadlines for concluding discovery and for filing dispositive motions. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/4/10 ORDERING that 33 Motion to Compel is GRANTED IN PART; Defendants shall provide, within 21 days of the filing date of this order, all of the documents sought by plaintiff in his Request fo r Production of Documents; Plaintiff shall, within 21 days of the filing date of this order, file with the court and serve upon defendants, two Amended Requests for Admission; Defendants shall, within 14 days after service of plaintiffs Request(s) for Admissions, serve their answers upon plaintiff and file copies with the court; discovery deadline and deadline for filing substantive motions are vacated pending further order of this court. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
25
DISCOVERY and SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/6/09: Discovery due by 11/30/2009. All Pre-trial Motions, except motions to compel discovery, due by 3/22/2010. Pretrial Conference and Trial dates will be set, as appropriate.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/2/09 GRANTING 10 Request for extension of time. Plaintiff is granted 30 days beyond the original deadline, or until 3/13/09, in which to file an amended complaint. There will be no further extension of time.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/12/09 ORDERING that plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED; Plaintiff is obligated to pay the filing fee of $350.00 for this action with an initial partial filing fee o f $22.67. All fees shall be collected and paid in accordance with this courts order to the Director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation filed concurrently herewith; Plaintiffs claims against defendants Solano County Jail custody staff andmedical staff are DISMISSED for the reasons discussed above, with leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
