Farr v. Sisto et al
| Leonard Farr |
| DK Sisto and Board of Parole Hearings |
| 2:2008cv03125 |
| December 23, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/21/09 RECOMMENDING that respondents' 12 motion to dismiss be granted; and this action be dismissed for failure to exhaust state court remedies. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due w/in 20 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/20/09 ORDERING that Respondents are directed to file a response to Petitioner's application within 60 days of the date of this order; clerk shall serve a copy of this order with a copy of the Petitioner's application on Attorney General Michael Farrell. (cc:AG) (Gaydosh, J)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/8/09 ORDERING that petitioner shall submit, within 30 days, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district. (Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
