Tucker v. Calvin et al
Plaintiff: Samuel H Tucker
Defendant: D. Calvin, A. Pfadt, D Shaver and T Smith
Case Number: 2:2009cv00087
Filed: January 12, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Lassen
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/17/09 ORDERING that w/in 14 days, dft to reimburse the USM for the cost of personal service, $103.62; the cler to serve a copy of this order on Valerie Duran, USM. (cc: USM)(Yin, K)
November 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/03/09 ORDERING the clerk of the court shall assign a District Judge to this action. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez randomly assigned to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendant's 07/24/09 motion to dismiss 12 be granted; and this action be dismissed. MOTION to DISMISS 12 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 20 days. (Plummer, M)
September 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/15/09 GRANTING 14 Motion to Strike. Plaintiff is granted 20 days from the date of this order to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss. (Dillon, M)
January 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/23/09 ORDERING that pltf's 2 request to proceed ifp is GRANTED; pltf to pay the $350 filing fee in accordance w/ the CDC order; pltf's claims against Pfadt, Shaver and Smith ar e DISMISSED w/ leave to file an amended cmplt w/in 30 days; upon filing an amended cmplt or expiration of the time allowed therefor, the court will make further orders for svce upon some or all of the dfts; pltf's 3 motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED w/out prejudice. (Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tucker v. Calvin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samuel H Tucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Calvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A. Pfadt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D Shaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?