Olivar v. Potter et al
Plaintiff: Jesse Olivar
Defendant: John E. Potter and Eli Lilly
Case Number: 2:2009cv00091
Filed: January 12, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Yolo
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/6/2010 ORDERING 59 Motion for Extension is GRANTED; Plaintiff shall file and serve his objections to findings and recommendations 28 days after being serve with this order; Any reply to plaintiff 's objections shall be filed and served w/in 14 days after electronic notice of the filing of the objections; and the Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/10/2010, at 3:00 p.m. and the Bench Trial set for 2/14/11, at 9:00 a.m. before the Honorable John A. Mendez are vacated pending disposition of defendant's motion to dismiss. (Matson, R)
September 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 58 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/16/2010 recommending that 39 MOTION to DISMISS filed by John E. Potter be granted; and 1 Complaint filed by Jesse Olivar be dismissed with prejudice and this action be closed. Matter referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due with 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Waggoner, D)
October 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 AMENDED STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/26/09: Discovery due by 8/16/2010. Dispositive Motions due by 10/11/2010. Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/10/2010 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. Bench Trial set for 2/14/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Kaminski, H)
July 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/27/09 ORDERING that plaintiff's 26 July 15, 2009 motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. (Duong, D)
April 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/15/09 RECOMMENDING that dft "Eli Lilly Pharm Company Business" be dismissed from this action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(m) and 20(a)(2). Objections due within 10 days. (Engbretson, K.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Olivar v. Potter et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesse Olivar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John E. Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eli Lilly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?