David v. Schwarzenegger et al
| David M. David |
| Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jerry Brown, James E. Tilton, Timeothy M Lockwood, Tom Felker, M. D. McDonald, Brian F Haws, J Flaherty and M Williams |
| 2:2009cv00092 |
| January 12, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Lassen |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/6/11 ORDERING that this appeal is not taken in good faith; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Pro Se Unit at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (cc Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 04/29/11 ordering plaintiff's amended complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER denying 28 Motion for a court-ordered deadline or preferred legal user status signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 01/13/11. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 3/30/2010 ORDERING that pltf's 12 , 19 , 21 motions for preliminary injunctions and restraining orders are DENIED w/out prejudice. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
