IconFind v. Yahoo! Featured Case
Plaintiff: IconFind Inc.
Defendant: Yahoo! Inc.
Case Number: 2:2009cv00109
Filed: January 13, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Patent Office
County: Yolo
Presiding Judge: John F. Moulds
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 15:1126 Patent Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER declining to relate cases signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 4/21/11. (Manzer, C)
March 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 61 STIPULATION and ORDER OF DISMISSAL signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 03/25/10 ORDERING that the Court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action; all claims that were or could have been alleged in the Complaint that rel ate to the patent in suit are hereby DISMISSED w/ prejudice. All counterclaims and defenses are DISMISSED w/o prejudice. The 50 12/14/09 remains in full force and effect. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)
February 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 59 STIPULATION and ORDER 58 for continuance signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 2/5/2010. Motions to Amend Scheduling Order and for Leave to file Amended Answer Hearing are RE-SET for 4/12/2010 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS). (Marciel, M)
February 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 2/2/10 GRANTING Stipulated MOTION to file documents under seal. The MOTION shall be SET for 3/29/2010 at 02:00 PM. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
December 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 12/16/2009 DENYING 49 Ex Parte Application filed by IconFind Inc.. (Matson, R)
December 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 12/14/2009. (Matson, R)
November 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 11/5/2009 ORDERING good cause appearing, the Court grants Defendant Yahoo! Inc's Stipulated Motion to File Documents Under Seal. Yahoo! Inc. may file UNDER SEAL its Notice of Motion for Claim Construction and all supporting exhibits. (Waggoner, D)
September 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 29 STIPULATION and PROTECTIVE ORDER 27 signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 9/1/2009. "Confidential Information" must be marked as Confidential Information and may include, but is not limited to all sensitive business and technical documents and tangible things. (Marciel, M)
January 13, 2009 Filing 1
COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Yahoo! Inc. by IconFind Inc.. (Redmon, Thomas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: IconFind v. Yahoo!
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: IconFind Inc.
Represented By: Thomas G Redmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yahoo! Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?