SureTec Insurance v. Orchard Hills Estates, et al
| SureTec Insurance Company |
| Orchard Hills Estates, LLC, Orchard Hills Estates, II, LLC, Richard A. Conto, Cheryl Lynn Conto, Brian N. McCarthy and Valerie Lojewski-McCarthy |
| 2:2009cv00110 |
| January 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/19/2012 GRANTING plaintiff's 33 36 Motions to Enforce Judgment against Trust Beneficiary. SureTec may enforce its Judgment against Cheryl Conto by levying on assets of Cheryl L. Conto Separate Property Trust Declaration of Living Trust dated 4/19/2007 (the"Trust"). This includes, but is not limited to, any real property being held in the name of the trust. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/26/12: Judgment Debtor Exam set for 6/20/2012 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
27
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/26/2010 recommending that 24 Motion for Default Judgment be granted; Plaintiff be awarded $118,156.98 in money damages to be paid by defendants, andeach of them to SureTec; Plaintiff be awarded $10,000.00 in collateral security to be posted to SureTec by defendants, and each of them to cover SureTec's anticipated exposure under the surety bonds issued on behalf of Orchard and Orchard II consisting of potential losses for payments to variousclaimants for claims against the Bonds and any and all attorneys' fees and costs associated therewith; Plaintiff be granted a declaration that defendants, and each of them, are obligated under the GIAs ex ecuted in favor of SureTec to (a) indemnify SureTec for any and all losses, expenses and costs SureTec incurs or may incur on the surety bonds issued on behalf of Orchardand Orchard II; and (b) post collateral security to SureTec for any and all losses, expenses and costs that SureTec anticipates in connection with the surety bonds issued on behalf of Orchard and Orchard II. Objections to F&R due w/in 14 days. (Matson, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
