Dorrell v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Lorna Dorrell |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2009cv00112 |
| January 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 42:416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/16/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION for Attorney Fees 30 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees under the EAJA in the amountof $7,751.49; Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratl iff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2010 WL 2346547 (2010), any payment shall be made payable to plaintiff and delivered to plaintiffs counsel, unless plaintiff does not owe a federal debt. If the United States Department of the Treasury determines that plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, the government shall accept plaintiffs assignment of EAJA fees and pay fees directly to plaintiffs counsel.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
28
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/25/10 ORDERING the voluntary remand and dismissal of case with directions to the clerk to enter judgment pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the FRCP. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATION and ORDER 25 to extend time signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/22/2010. Defendant has until 5/21/2010 to respond to plaintiff's 21 Motion for Summary Judgment and Opening Brief. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/29/10 ORDERING Plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before 2/17/2010, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecutiion and why Plaintif and/or Plaintiff's counsel should not be monetarily sanctioned for failure to comply with court orders.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER re: 14 Ext of Time for Pltf to File Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/4/09. Pltf's time to file the summary judgment is hereby EXTENDED from 8/3/09 to 11/10/09. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/9/2009 ORDERING 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS is GRANTED; The Clerk is directed to serve the scheduling order in Social Security cases; The Clerk is also directed to serve a copy of this order on the USM; and w/in 15 days pltf shall submit appropriate paperwork to the USM for service. (Matson, R) Modified on 2/9/2009 (Matson, R).(cc USM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dorrell v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lorna Dorrell | |
| Represented By: | Bess M. Brewer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
