Woolever v. Adams
| Robert Alvin Woolever, Jr. |
| Darrel Adams |
| 2:2009cv00126 |
| January 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Kings |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 9/19/2011 ORDERING a Certificate of Appealability shall NOT issue in this case. re 41 Notice of Appeal filed by Robert Alvin Woolever, Jr.. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 8/2/2011 DENYING petitioner's 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus. This action is TERMINATED. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/07/11 ordering the clerk of the court is directed to substitute Raul Lopez for Darrel Adams as the respondent in this action. Respondent's 06/18/10 motion to dismiss claims 3 through 6 as fil ed beyond the 1 year statute of limitations 29 is granted. Within 60 days from the service of this order, respondent shall file and serve an answer with respect to claims 1 and 2 of the amended petition. Petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within 30 days after service of the answer. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/8/2009 DENYING 9 Motion to Stay without prejudice; within 30 days petitioner shall file a motion for stay and abeyance as set forth in this motion; respondent's opposition due within 30 days thereafter; the court's 5 order requiring response to petition is VACATED; respondent's 12 application for an extenstion of time is DENIED as unnecessary; the 11 petition for writ of mandate is DENIED. (Gaydosh, J) Modified on 4/10/2009 (Gaydosh, J).
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/02/09 ordering petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is granted. Respondent is directed to file a response to petitioner's habeas petition within 60 days from the dat e of this order. The clerk of the court shall serve a copy of this order, a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus and the court's form regarding consent or request for reassignment on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General. (cc: Michael Farrell). (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER, INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER to SACRAMENTO signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/14/2009. New Case number is 2:09-cv-00126-DAD (HC). (Figueroa, O)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Woolever v. Adams | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Robert Alvin Woolever, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Darrel Adams | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
