Gibson v. Chief Medical Officer of California Department of Corrections et al
Plaintiff: Robert D. Gibson
Defendant: Chief Medical Officer of California Department of Corrections, J. Clark Kelso, Trace O'Maiorino, Edmund Brown, Jr., Chief Dietian of the California Department of Corrections and Arnold Schwarzenegger
Case Number: 2:2009cv00230
Filed: January 26, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Monterey
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Circuit Judge Marsha S. Berzon on 10/13/10 ORDERING that Pltf's 26 Fourth Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim. This dismissal counts as a "strike" under the "3-strikes" provision of 28 USC § 1915(g). CASE CLOSED. (Owen, K)
August 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Circuit Judge Marsha S. Berzon on 8/25/2010 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 21 Motion for Extension of Time to file a Fourth Amended Complaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. If Plaintiff chooses to file a fourth amended compl aint, he must do so no later than October 11, 2010. Plaintiff's 22 Motion to Authenticate the Courts April 9, 2010 order is granted. Plaintiff's 20 Motion for 90-Day Extension of Time is DENIED as moot. No further extensions of time t o file an amended complaint will be granted. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint or a Notice of Dismissal by October 11, 2010, the Court shall, without further notice, order the Clerk of the Court to dismiss this action. The dismissal will count as a "strike" under the "3-strikes" provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g).(Duong, D)
July 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Circuit Judge Marsha S. Berzon on 7/8/2010 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 18 Third Amended Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend his complaint and may file a Fourth Amended Complaint in compliance with this Order no later than 30 days from the date this Order is filed. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff a Prisoner Complaint form along with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint or a Notice of Dismissal within 30 days from the date this Order is filed, the Clerk of the Court shall, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal stating that the dismissal counts as a "strike under 28 USC 1915(g). (Duong, D)
April 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by Circuit Judge Marsha S. Berzon on 4/9/10: Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 2 and Motions to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 8 , 9 , and 12 are granted. Motion to Appoint Counsel is denied without prejudice 7 . Motion for Le ave to File a Second Amended Complaint is granted 10 . Second Amended Complaint 11 is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a third amended complaint in compliance with this Order. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff a Prisoner Complaint form along with this order. (Kaminski, H)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gibson v. Chief Medical Officer of California Department of Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert D. Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chief Medical Officer of California Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Clark Kelso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trace O'Maiorino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edmund Brown, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chief Dietian of the California Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arnold Schwarzenegger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?