Harris v. Felker

Harris v. Felker

Petitioner:	Terrance L. Harris
Respondent:	Tom Felker
Case Number:	2:2009cv00264
Filed:	January 29, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	Lassen
Presiding Judge:	William B. Shubb
Presiding Judge:	Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 2, 2009	Filing 17 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/30/09 ORDERING that the court's May 20, 2009 order to show cause is discharged; Respondents 11 request to substitute Acting Warden McDonald as respondent in this action is GRANTED; Petitioners 15 motion is GRANTED; and Clerk is directed to amend the docket to reflect that Acting Warden Mike McDonald is the respondent in this action. It is RECOMMENDED that Respondent's 11 motion to dismiss be granted and this action be closed. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 20 days.(Dillon, M)
February 9, 2009	Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/6/09 ORDERING that petitioners application to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is GRANTED; Respondent is directed to file a response to petitioners habeas petition within 60 days from the date of this order. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order, a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and a copy of the form regarding consent or request for reassignment on Michael Patrick Farrell. (cc Michael Farrell)(Dillon, M)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 2, 2009

Filing 17 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/30/09 ORDERING that the court's May 20, 2009 order to show cause is discharged; Respondents 11 request to substitute Acting Warden McDonald as respondent in this action is GRANTED; Petitioners 15 motion is GRANTED; and Clerk is directed to amend the docket to reflect that Acting Warden Mike McDonald is the respondent in this action. It is RECOMMENDED that Respondent's 11 motion to dismiss be granted and this action be closed. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 20 days.(Dillon, M)

February 9, 2009

Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/6/09 ORDERING that petitioners application to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is GRANTED; Respondent is directed to file a response to petitioners habeas petition within 60 days from the date of this order. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order, a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and a copy of the form regarding consent or request for reassignment on Michael Patrick Farrell. (cc Michael Farrell)(Dillon, M)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Felker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Terrance L. Harris
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Tom Felker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?