Lacey v. Dominguez
| Billy J. Lacey |
| Dominguez |
| 2:2009cv00357 |
| February 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Kings |
| John F. Moulds |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 11/12/09 ORDERING the clerk of the court is directed to assign a district judge to this case. U.S. District Judge Garland E. Burrell randomly assigned to this action . Also, RECOMMENDING that defendants' 08/26/09 motion to dismiss defendants Vera, Kramer and Ebbitt be granted. Plaintiff's 1983 claims against defendants Vera, Kramer and Ebbitt be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to suit. Defendants 08/26/09 motion to dismiss defendant Dominguez be granted; and this action be dismissed. MOTION to DISMISS 30 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell; Objections due within 20 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 10/13/09 DENYING 33 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 09/11/09 denying 29 motion for default and granting 31 Motion for Extension of time. Plaintiff is granted up to and including 10/16/09, in which to file and serve a response to defendants' 08/26/09 motion to dismiss. Defendants' reply, if any, shall be filed 7 days thereafter. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 8/11/09 ORDERING that pltf's 23 motion for admission will be placed in the court file and DISREGARDED, pltf is cautioned that further filing of discovery requests or responses, except as required by rule of court, may result in an order of sanctions, including, but not limited to, a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and pltf's 22 motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lacey v. Dominguez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Billy J. Lacey | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dominguez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
