Munson v. State of California
Plaintiff: Kenneth Munson
Defendant: State of California
Case Number: 2:2009cv00478
Filed: February 19, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 82 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/7/14 re: 81 EXTENDING deadline to file settlement/dismissal documents to 8/8/14. (Meuleman, A)
December 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/2/2013 ORDERING that plaintiff's 70 opposition to defendants' 7/29/13 request for additional discovery is both untimely and moot. (Yin, K)
May 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 05/07/13 ( Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/3/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan.) The parties shall file a joint pretrial statement not later than 14 days prior to the pretrial conference. (Plummer, M)
December 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/19/12 ordering ( Settlement Conference set for 4/10/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (GGH) before Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows.)Each party shall provide a confidential settlement conference statement to Sujean Park, ADR Coordinatr so they arrive no later than 04/01/13.(cc: GGH) (Plummer, M) Modified on 12/19/2012 (Plummer, M).
October 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/31/12 ordering the parties to this action shall each, no later than 14 days from the date of this order, submit confidential statements as described below. (See order for further details)(Plummer, M)
October 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/24/2012 ADOPTING 44 Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 38 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's claims that the CMF shower facilities and canteen services violated the ADA and RA; OTHERWISE DENYING 38 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Michel, G)
August 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 44 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/8/2012 recommending that 38 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT by defendant be granted as to plaintiff's claims that the CMF shower facilities and canteen services violate d the ADA and RA and otherwise denied; Matter referred to Judge John A. Mendez; any party may file objections to the findings and recommendations with 14 days after being served; failure to file objections within the time specified may waive the right to appeal the district court's order. (Waggoner, D)
March 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/25/11 ORDERING the findings and recommendations 34 are adopted in full; Defendant's 6/9/10 motion to dismiss 29 is granted as to plaintiff's claim under the California Disabled Persons Act, plai ntiff's requests for injunctive relief under the Americans with Disabilities Act and Rehabilitation Act, and any possible claim to enforce 28 C.F.R. §§ 35.105 and 35.150; and In all other respects, defendant's motion to dismiss is denied. (Becknal, R)
January 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 01/24/11 recommending that defendant's 06/09/10 motion to dismiss 29 be granted as to plaintiff's claim under the California Disabled Persons Act, plaintiff requ ests for injunctive relief under the Americans with Disabilities Act and Rehabilitation Act, and any possible claim to enforce 28 C.F.R. section 35.105 and 35.150. In all other respects defendant's motion to dismiss be denied. MOTION to DISMISS 29 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
May 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER adopting 26 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/21/2010; The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Civil Rights Act claim; Claims against Doe defendants are dismissed without prejudice; and defendant is directed to, w/in 30 days, file a response to the complaint as herein narrowed.(Matson, R)
February 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 26 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/25/10 RECOMMENDING that the court decline supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs Unruh Civil Rights Act claim; Claims against Doe defendants be dismissed without prejudice; and Defendant be directed to, within 30 days, file a response to the complaint as herein narrowed. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
July 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/31/09 ORDERING that dfts' 20 motion to review the cmplt pursuant to 28 USC 1915A is GRANTED; dfts' 20 motion to stay discovery is GRANTED; and discovery is STAYED until the court conducts the statutorily required review of the cmplt and resolves any motion to dismiss that the dfts may thereafter file.(Yin, K)
February 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, DENYING 5 Motion to Dismiss; VACATING 9 Motion for Relief from Scheduling Order; DENYING AS MOOT 16 Motion to Strike. Case Transferred to the Eastern District of CA (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2009) Modified on 2/5/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from cand on 2/19/2009.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Munson v. State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Munson
Represented By: Mark Dee Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of California
Represented By: Jose Alfonso Zelidon-Zepeda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?