Stanton, et al v. Couturier, et al
| Darleen Stanton and Kelly Morrell |
| Bruce P Courturier and The Employee Ownership Holding Company |
| 2:2009cv00519 |
| February 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
| Sacramento |
| Frank C. Damrell |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER granting in part and denying in part the Motion to Dismiss at Docket 23 . (Short, Jan)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER signed by District Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 10/09/09 GRANTING 37 Motion for preliminary injunction; TEOHC is hereby ordered to hold Bruce Couturiers potential attorney fees in escrow, or to show cause why it cannot or should not be required to do so. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by District Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 9/17/2009 GRANTING 37 TEOHC's Motion for a TRO is GRANTED. The above-referenced arbitration proceeding is hereby temporarily STAYED and ENJOINED. The parties to the arbitration proceeding ar e hereby ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from participating in such proceeding pending the Court's decision as to whether a preliminary injunction should be issued. The above TRO is effective upon TEOHC's filing an undertaking in the sum of $5 ,000. Dft Bruce Couturier is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the arbitration proceeding should not be stayed and enjoined pending a determination by the Court in this action of the validity and enforceability of the indemnification agreement between Couturier and TEOHC. Couturier shall file any papers in opposition to the issuance of a preliminary injunction on or before 9/22/2009. TEOHC shall file any reply papers in support of the issuance of a preliminary injunction on or before 9/23/2009. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
