Torres v. Havilland
| Jose Ramirez Torres |
| John Havilland |
| 2:2009cv00531 |
| February 24, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/03/14 ordering the clerk of the court shall strike the first amended petition 76 from the docket of this closed case; Open a new case and file the first amended petition in the new habeas proce eding (New case number is 2:14-cv-842 MCE AC P). Assign the new case to District Judge Morrison C. England Jr. and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. Make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this additional assignment. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/14/13 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court substitute Marion Spearman in place of John Havilland as respondent in the docket of this case. It is RECOMMENDED that respondents motion to dismiss 58 be granted on grounds of non-exhaustion, the petition be dismissed without prejudice, and this case be closed. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/21/11 ordering petitioner is required to show cause in writing within 30 days of the date of this order, why his petition for writ of habeas corpus should not be summarily dismissed as untimely. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER SUBSTITUTING ATTORNEYS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/02/11 ordering that Krista Hart, Attorney at Law shall be substituted in as appointed counsel for petitioner in place of the Office of the Federal Defender for the Eastern District of California. The parties shall file a joint status report on or before 12/01/11. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER denying as duplicative 32 and 33 Motions for Certificate of Appealability, signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 2/11/10. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/18/09 ORDERING that Petitioner's request for a certificate of appealability 25 is denied;and Petitioner's motion for an extension of time 26 is denied asunnecessary. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER denying 14 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 07/20/09. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Torres v. Havilland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jose Ramirez Torres | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: John Havilland | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
