Grassi, et al v. Moody's Investors Services, et al
| Ronald M Grassi and Sally Grassi |
| Moody's Investors Services, Standard & Poor's and Fitch Ratings |
| 2:2009cv00543 |
| February 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| John A. Mendez |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 42:1396 - Tort Negligence |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/5/2011 ORDERING 99 Request filed by Ronald M. Grassi, Sally Grassi and 106 Request filed by Sally Grassi are DENIED; 104 Application filed by Ronald M. Grassi, Sally Grassi is DENIED as MOOT; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 85 MOTION to DISMISS filed by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. be granted without leave to amend; and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Matter referred to Judge John A. Mendez; within 21 days from the date of this order, any party may file objections to the findings and recommendations. (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/8/2010 DENYING pltf's 96 request to file a reply to dfts' reply. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/26/2010 ORDERING that plaintiffs' 93 May 21, 2010 request to attach a proposed second amended complaint is DENIED. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
84
AMENDED STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/27/2010 re 83 ORDERING that the Motion Filing Deadline is 5/3/2010; Opposition due by 5/24/2010; Reply due by 6/7/2010. Motion Hearing set for 7/9/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/26/10 ORDERING that dfts' 44 , 47 , 52 Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED; plfs' 55 Request for Limited Discovery is DENIED and plfs are granted 30 days to file an amended complaint. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/02/09 ORDERING that plf's 71 Motion (Request) to file a reply is DENIED. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/13/09 GRANTING 63 Motion To File A Supplemental Brief. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' supplemental opposition to defendants' motions to dismiss shall be filed and served within 15 days after this order is filed, and defendants' replies, if any, shall be filed and served within 15 days after service of plaintiffs' supplemental opposition. (Streeter, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
