Cottrell v. Wright et al
Plaintiff: Michael M. Cottrell
Defendant: M. Wright, R. Haynes and D. Sisson
Case Number: 2:2009cv00824
Filed: March 25, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Lassen
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/14/12 ORDERING plaintiff's motion to compel 59 is denied. Plaintifs's motion to stay the motion for summary judgment 60 is denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendants' motion for summary judgment 51 be granted. Motion 51 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M)
July 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/13/2012 ORDERING that plaintiff will be provided 21 days to file additional evidentiary materials regarding defendants' motion for summary judgment, although it is not required. No extensions will be given.(Yin, K)
January 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/31/12 ORDERING that within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment or a statement of non-opposition. (Dillon, M)
June 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/14/11 ordering defendants shall file a response to the document filed with the court by plaintiff on 06/02/11 within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
January 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER ADOPTING 31 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 01/27/11 and ORDERING that dfts' 26 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED; dfts shall file their answer w/i 14 days. (Benson, A.)
November 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 31 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/17/2010 RECOMMENDING that dfts' 26 motion to dismiss be denied. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due w/in 21 days. (Yin, K)
April 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 04/02/10 ordering that the findings and recommendations filed 02/19/10 16 are hereby vacated.(Plummer, M)
February 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 16 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 02/19/10 recommending that this action be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 60 days. (Plummer, M)
December 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/28/09 DIRECTING USM to serve * complaint * filed on * 03/25/09,* on * M. Wright, R. Haynes, D. Sisson*. (cc: USM) (Plummer, M)
November 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/24/09 ORDERING that Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff three blank USM-285 forms; and within 30 days, plaintiff shall submit to the court the three completed USM-285 forms with the addresses for the defendants included required to effect service.(Dillon, M)
August 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/24/09 ORDERING that Clerk is directed to remove CM/ECF pages nine through twenty four from the complaint filed in this action, as they are duplicative of the complaint,leaving the original com plaint only (CM/ECF pages one through eight); Plaintiffs requests for leave to proceed IFP 7 and 8 are GRANTED; Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action, to be collected and paid in accordance with th is courts order to the Director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation filed concurrently herewith. Service is appropriate for defendants Wright, Haynes andSisson. Clerk shall send plaintiff three USM-285 forms, one summons, an instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed 3/25/09. Within 30 days, plaintiff shall complete the Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the appropriate documents to the court.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cottrell v. Wright et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael M. Cottrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Haynes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Sisson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?