Glover v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Charlotte Glover
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2009cv00898
Filed: April 1, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM, OPINION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 08/05/10 DENYING 25 Motion for Summary Judgment ; GRANTING 27 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. CASE CLOSED. (Williams, D)
June 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/28/10, ORDERING that 23 the Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED, and pltf's motion for summary judgment is deemed properly filed. Dft's cross-motion for summary judgment shall be filed pursuant to the time set forth in the court's scheduling order. (Kastilahn, A)
May 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 05/05/10 ORDERING that plf shall show cause in writing w/i 14 days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to file a dispositive motion. Plaintiff is again warned that failure to respond to this order may result in dismissal of the action for the reasons outlined above, as well as for failure to prosecute and comply with court rules and orders. (Benson, A.)
April 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 22 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 04/01/10 ORDERING that plf's time to file the summary judgment in this case is hereby EXTENDED to 04/09/10; this is plf's fourth extension of time. Plaintiff is cautioned that further extensions of time are discouraged and will be denied unless good cause is shown. (Benson, A.)
February 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER 19 for Extension of Time signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/10/2010. Plaintiff's time to file Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 3/29/2010. (Marciel, M)
December 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/23/09 ORDERING that the plaintiff's time to file summary judgment in this case is hereby EXTENDED from 12/18/09 to 2/5/09. (Donati, J)
November 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/3/2009 ORDERING 15 that the Plaintiff's time to file the summary judgmentin this case is hereby EXTENDED to 12/18/2009. (Reader, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Glover v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charlotte Glover
Represented By: Bess M. Brewer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?