Smith v. Wackenhut Corporation
Plaintiff: Marvin Smith
Defendant: Wackenhut Corporation
Case Number: 2:2009cv00982
Filed: April 10, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/9/09 ORDERING that Defendant's 19 motion to dismiss or transfer is GRANTED. Plaintiff's 23 motion to establish admissions is DENIED. Plaintiffs 28 motion for leave to have ele ctronic access is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. Defendant shall file an answer to plaintiff's complaint on or before October 12, 2009. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D)
September 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/11/09 ORDERING that the Hearing on defendant's amended motion to dismiss remains on calendar for 9/30/09, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 25; and, Plaintiff's 9/9/09, motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice. (Becknal, R)
September 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 09/04/09 GRANTING 22 Motion to Continue Hearing. IT IS ORDERED that the hearing date of 9/16/09 is continued to 9/30/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Bren nan. On or before 9/9/09, plaintiff may file a further opposition to defendant's amended motion to dismiss; on or before 9/16/09, defendant shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to plaintiff's 9/2/09 motion, and may file a reply to plaintiff's opposition to its amended motion to dismiss; and on or before 9/23/09, plaintiff may file a reply to any opposition defendant files to plaintiff's 9/2/09 motion.(Streeter, J) Modified on 9/8/2009 (Streeter, J).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Wackenhut Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marvin Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wackenhut Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?