Bracamonte v. Grady et al
Plaintiff: John E Bracamonte
Defendant: R Grady and P Ash
Case Number: 2:2009cv01205
Filed: May 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Amador
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K Delaney on 08/07/11 ordering defendants 10/21/10 request for extension of time 32 is granted. The reply brief filed 11/15/10 is deemed timely. Defendants' 10/05/10 motion to dismiss 29 is granted. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. This case is closed. (Plummer, M)
October 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/14/10 granting 28 Motion for extension of time. Their motion to dismiss is deemed timely. The clerk of the court is directed to file defendants' motion to dismiss separately. Plaintiff shall file his opposition to defendants' motion no later than 30 days from this order. (Plummer, M)
August 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/20/10 granting 24 Motion to modify the scheduling order. The last day to file pretrial motions is to and including 9/30/10. (Dillon, M)
April 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 04/15/10 DENYING 21 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Williams, D)
April 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER denying 18 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 04/02/10. (Plummer, M)
November 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DIRECTING USM to serve * complaint * filed on * 5/4/09,* on * R Grady, P Ash*, signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/3/09: The Clerk of the Court shall serve upon plaintiff a copy of the Local Rules of Court.(Kaminski, H)
October 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of John E. Bracamonte signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/08/09. CDC is to collect payments form plaintiff's trust account until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The clerk of the court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP application on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bracamonte v. Grady et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John E Bracamonte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R Grady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: P Ash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?