United States of America v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
United States of America |
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation |
2:2009cv01229 |
May 5, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Lawrence K. Karlton |
None |
32 U.S.C. ยง 4323 Employment Rights of Uniformed Officers |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/12/2011 GRANTING plaintiff's 55 Motion for Dissolution of Consent Decree. The Decree is DISSOLVED and the 10/24/2011 Hearing on the Motion is VACATED. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 54 CONSENT DECREE signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/14/2010 re 53 . CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D) |
Filing 52 ORDER RE Disposal documents after notification of settlement signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/23/2010. All hearing dates in this matter are vacated. (Matson, R) Modified on 6/24/2010 (Matson, R). |
Filing 49 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/16/10 ORDERING a scheduling conference SET for 7/12/2010 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Parties shall file status reports 14 days prior to the scheduling conference.(Carlos, K) |
Filing 43 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 05/06/10 ORDERING that plf's 40 Motion to Compel is DENIED w/o prejudice. If the case does not settle, plf may refile the motion for hearing on 06/09/10 as authorized by the district judge's 42 05/06/10 order. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 39 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/26/10 ORDERING that the Plaintiff United States is hereby granted an extension of one week to file its Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel Discovery Responses by Defendant for hearing on May 12, 2010. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 30 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/22/2010 ORDERING this case is hereby referred to a settlement judge for a settlement conference.(Matson, R) |
Filing 28 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/12/10 ORDERING the scheduling order modified. Motions to compel shall be filed so that they may be heard by March 17, 2010. All other dates remain unchanged.(Donati, J) |
Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/14/2010 ORDERING that as stated on the record and for the reasons stated thereon, each of the 16 17 18 motions is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.(Duong, D) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: United States of America v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Karen D. Woodard |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.