Rodgers v. Placer County Sheriff's Department
James T. Rodgers |
Placer County Sheriff's Department |
2:2009cv01367 |
May 18, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Placer |
Edmund F. Brennan |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/15/11 ORDERING that his action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 35 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 09/19/11 ordering that the amended complaint is dismissed with leave to amend within 30 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 33 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 03/11/11 denying 32 Motion to Appoint Counsel and granteing plaintiff's request for an extension of time 32 . Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this order is served to file and serve an amended complaint in accordance with the court's 10/27/10 order. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 30 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 01/11/11 ordering plaintiff's 11/12/10 request for an extension of time is granted and plaintiff has 30 days from the date this order is served to file and serve an amended complaint in accordance with the court's 10/27/10 order. Plaintiff may seek another extension of time if his condition has not improved. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/27/10 ORDERING the complaint 25 is DISMISSED with leave to amend within 30 days. (Carlos, K) |
Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/30/10 ORDERING that plaintiff may, if he so desires, file a third amended complaint within 30 days of the date this order is served. Clerk to send plaintiff a copy of the form for the filing of a civil complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 01/05/10 DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT SERVICE DOCUMENTS and USM-285 Forms. Service is appropriate for defendants Gutierrez and Placer County Sheriff's Department. Clerk to send plaintiff: 1 Summons, 2 USM-285 Forms, and 1 copies of the Complaint filed on 10/07/09 to be completed and returned within 21 days.(Plummer, M) Modified on 1/6/2010 (Plummer, M). |
Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/17/09 ORDERING that plaintiff is granted one final opportunity to submit either the filing fee or the application to proceed IFP. Clerk of the Court is directed to mail to plaintiff a form application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.(Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rodgers v. Placer County Sheriff's Department | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: James T. Rodgers | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Placer County Sheriff's Department | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.