Jones v. Jenkins et al
Plaintiff: Steven Jones
Defendant: Christopher Jenkins, Bryan Colvin and Elijah Coran
Case Number: 2:2009cv01373
Filed: May 18, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 02/22/13 recommending that defendants Caron's and Colvin's motion to dismiss 18 in which defendant Jenkins joined 19 be granted; and this action be dismissed. MOTION to DISMISS 18 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
January 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/4/2013 GRANTING the 24 US Marshal's request for reimbursement of costs, in the amount of $139.68 for effecting service upon defendant Christopher Jenkins; and defendant Jenkins must, if he has not done so, forward such payment to the US Marshal's office forthwith; and the Clerk to serve a copy of this order on the US Marshal. (cc: USM)(Yin, K)
December 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/4/12 ORDERING that within 14 days from the date of this order defendant Christopher Jenkins shall pay to the United States Marshal the sum of $139.68 unless within that time defendant Jen kins files a written statement showing good cause for his failure to waive service. The court does not intend to extend this fourteen day period. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal. (cc USM)(Dillon, M)
April 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/20/2012. Plaintiff shall inform Court within 30 days whether wishes his case to be re-opened, defendants to be served, and this matter to proceed. (Marciel, M)
August 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 08/19/09 DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Jenkins et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Jenkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bryan Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Elijah Coran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?