Lopez et al v. Wachovia Mortgage et al
| Steven Lopez and Carmen Lopez |
| Wachovia Mortgage, World Savings Bank, Comstock Mortgage, David Mendoza and Adrian Del Rio |
| 2:2009cv01510 |
| June 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| John A. Mendez |
| Plaintiff |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/21/10 ORDERING that dfts' 64 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and dfts Comstock Mortgage, Mendoza and Del Rio are DISMISSED w/ prejudice. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
65
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 09/08/10 DISMISSING Defendant Wachovia without prejudice. Each party will bear their own fees and costs. (Williams, D)
|
|
Filing
62
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/5/2010 GRANTING 61 Stipulation and Proposed Order; The present dicovery cuttoff is extended to 9/3/2010 to allow defendants to take the depositions of plaintiffs Steve Lopez and Carmen Lopez on August 25 and 26, 2010. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/3/2010 As set forth above, it is hereby ordered that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, WITH PREJUDICE. Defendant's Motion to Strike is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Paragraph 57 and the words "rescission of the loan" from paragraph 98 shall be stricken. Paragraphs 43, 124, 127, and 128 shall not be stricken from the TAC. Plaintiffs request to file a Fourth Amended Complaint is DENIED. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
57
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/4/2010 ORDERING that the deadlines originally set by the Court's 10/5/2010 Scheduling Order are CONTINUED to the dates stipulated by the parties and the trial is CONTINUED to 1/10/2011 at 9:00 AM. (Engbretson, K.)
|
|
Filing
47
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/30/09: Defendants Comstock Mortgage, David Mendoza, and Adrian Del Rio shall have additional time up to and including January 21, 2010, within which to respond to the Third Amended Complaint on file herein. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/19/09 ORDERING that the Defendant's motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; Dismissal of the TILA claim for damages and rescission is GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Dismissal of the RESPA claims for violation of section 2603(b) is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE; Dismissal of the RESPA claim for violation of section 2605(e)(2)is DENIED; Dismissal of the state law causes of action is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE; Defendant's Motion to Stri ke is dismissed as moot with respect to striking FAC paragraphs 68, 92, 95, 103, 114, 120, and 121. With respect to striking FAC paragraph 62 and prayer for relief paragraph 7, the Motion to Strike is DENIED; Plaintiffs shall have 20 days from the date of this order to file a Third Amended Complaint. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/14/2009; 20 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; pltfs have 20 days from the date of this order to file a second amended complaint. (Suttles, J)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER re 16 Stipulation, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/9/09. Dfts are GRANTED addt'l time up to and including 7/21/09, within which to respond to the complaint.(Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
