Harris v. State of California et al
Plaintiff: Wayde Hollis Harris
Defendant: State of California, County of San Joaquin, County Jail of San Joaquin and County Hospital of San Joaquin
Case Number: 2:2009cv01557
Filed: June 5, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER denying 68 Motion to seal medical records signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/19/12. (Plummer, M)
August 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 64 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/20/2012, RECOMMENDING that defendant Thomas' 53 motion for summary judgment be granted; plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim against defendant Thomas be dismissed; and this case be closed. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 21 days. (Yin, K)
July 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 07/10/12 ordering plaintiff's opposition to defendant Thomas's 04/30/12 motion for summary judgment is due by 08/08/12. Any reply to plaintiff's opposition shall be due no later than 14 days after service of the opposition. (Plummer, M)
June 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/4/2012 ORDERING that within 21 days, plaintiff shall file an opposition to the 53 motion for summary judgment or a statement of non-opposition. (Yin, K)
September 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/27/11 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 7/27/11, 43 are ADOPTED in full; Defendants' MOTION to DISMISS 27 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: Granted as to Pla intiff's claims against defendants Ordez, Gudino, Noack, Elsey, Savage and San Joaquin County thereby resulting in their being dismissed from this action; and Denied as to plaintiffs Fourteenth Amendment claim against defendant Thomas. Defendant Thomas is ordered to file her answer within twenty-one days. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
July 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/26/11 ORDERING defendants' 01/07/11 request for judicial notice is granted. The court judicially notices the fact that plaintiff was sentenced in the Supe rior Court of San Joaquin County to state prison on 10/24/08, Also, RECOMMENDING that defendants' motion to dismiss be granted in part and denied in part as follows: Granted as to plaintiff's claims against defendants Ordez, Gudino, Noack, Elsey, Savage and San Joaquin County thereby resulting in their being dismissed from this action; and denied as to plaintiff's 14th amendment claim against defendant Thomas. Defendant Thomas be ordered to file her answer within 21 days. MOTION to DISMISS 27 referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell. Objections due within 21 days.(Plummer, M)
April 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 04/08/11 ordering the 04/06/11 opposition is hereby stricken. Plaintiff is granted 30 days within which to file an opposition which complies with the 04/06/11 order. (Plummer, M)
April 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/7/11 GRANTING 32 Motion to file an opposition in excess of 25 pages; Plaintiffs opposition to defendants pending motion to dismiss shall not exceed 35 pages; Plaintiffs opposition must be limited to the matters raised in defendants motion to dismiss.(Dillon, M)
October 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/12/10 ordering the clerk of the court shall send plaintiff 1 USM-285 form, instruction sheet and a copy of the 12/28/09 amended complaint to be completed and returned within 30 days. (Plummer, M)
November 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/24/09 ORDERING that 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED; Plaintiff is obligated to pay the filing fee of $350.00 for this action, with an initia l partial filing fee of $33.12. All fees shall be collected and paid in accordance with this courts order to the Director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation filed concurrently herewith. Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED with 30 days to file an amended complaint. (Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. State of California et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wayde Hollis Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of San Joaquin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County Jail of San Joaquin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County Hospital of San Joaquin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?