Ruiz v. National City Bank
| Enrique Ruiz |
| National City Bank and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
| 2:2009cv01586 |
| June 8, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| John A. Mendez |
| Plaintiff |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/20/2011 DISMISSING Plaintiff's 31 First Amended Complaint on the merits, with prejudice, in favor of Defendant J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/16/11 ORDERING that Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS 53 is GRANTED, WITH PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED that within ten (10) days of this order Kimberlee A. Rode shall either (1) pay sanctins of $150.00 to the Clerk of the Court, or (2) submit a statement of good cause explaining her failure to comply with Local Rule (230) (c). (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
49
JUDGMENT issued by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/29/10 pursuant to the Order 46 of 3/17/10. (Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/22/2009 GRANTING 16 Stipulation and Proposed Order to extend time to respond to plaintiff's complaint to 7/30/2009. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/15/09 ORDERING that NCB has until and including 7/21/09 to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
