Brown v JP Morgan Chase Bank, et al.,
Plaintiff: Christopher Brown
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A, Loan Center of California, Inc., EMC Mortgage Corporation and Mortgage Lenders Financial Network, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2009cv01594
Filed: June 8, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Frank C. Damrell
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/20/2010 ORDERING that the hearing date of 1/27/2010 on 13 Motion to Dismiss is vacated. IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed based on plaintiff's failure to prosecute the action; 13 Motion to Dismiss be denied as moot; and the Clerk be directed to close this case. Objections to F&R due w/in 14 days. (Matson, R)
December 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/7/2009 ORDERING the hearing on dfts' motion to dismiss is continued to 1/27/2010, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned; Pltf shall show cause, in writing, no later than 1/13/2010, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the pending motion; Pltf shall file an opposition to the motion, or a statement of non-opposition thereto, no later than 1/13/2010; Failure of pltf to file an opposition will be deemed a statement of non-opposition to the pending motion, and may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (Matson, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v JP Morgan Chase Bank, et al.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A
Represented By: S. Christopher Yoo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Loan Center of California, Inc.
Represented By: S. Christopher Yoo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EMC Mortgage Corporation
Represented By: S. Christopher Yoo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mortgage Lenders Financial Network, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Brown
Represented By: David A. Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?