Copia Claims v. Calif Infrastructure and Economic Dev. Bank
| Copia Claims, LLC |
| California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. and ACA Financial Guaranty Corporation |
| 2:2009cv01610 |
| June 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 - Diversity: Securities & Exchange Commission Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/8/11 ORDERING George's 10(b) claim against dfts is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and this action shall be closed. CASE CLOSED.(Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
74
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 6/18/2010 ORDERING 73 Lead Plaintiff will file and serve its Second Amended Consolidated Complaint on or before 7/12/2010; Dfts will move to dismiss the SACC on or before 8/13/2010; L ead Pltf will file and serve any papers in opposition to Dfts' motion to dismiss the SACC on or before 9/10/2010; Dfts will file and serve any reply papers in support of their motion to dismiss on or before 10/1/2010; and a hearing on Dfts motion to dismiss the will be held on 10/18/2010 at 9:00 AM,, or at such other time as is convenient for the Court. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' 57 MOTION TO DISMISS signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 6/10/2010. George is GRANTED leave to file an amended complaint within 14 days. (Engbretson, K.)
|
|
Filing
56
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/4/2010 ORDERING 55 Defendants will move to dismiss the First Amended Consolidated Complaint on or before 2/5/2010; Lead Plaintiff will file and serve any papers in opposition to Dft s' motions to dismiss to the Consolidated Complaint on or before 3/5/2010; Dfts will file and serve any reply papers in support of their motions to dismiss on or before 3/24/2010; A hearing on Dfts' 47 motions to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint will be held on 4/5/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr., or at such other time as is convenient for the Court. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
54
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/5/10 ORDERING lead Pltf's First Amended Complaint 5 DEEMED FILED and shall supersede all prior pleadings in this action; the hearing on dfts' Motion to dismiss consolidated complaint 52 shall be taken off calendar.(Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
44
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/24/09: Pursuant to the Court's order of August 4, 2009, Defendants will move to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint on or before December 4, 2009. A hearing on Defendants' motions to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint is scheduled on February 8, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 09/15/09 GRANTING 28 MOTION for Appointment as Lead Plaintiff and for Approval of His Selection of Lead Counsel filed by William George. (Streeter, J)
|
|
Filing
37
TENTATIVE RULING signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/11/2009 re 28 Motion to be appointed the lead plaintiff and George's selection of McGrane Greenfield and Kershaw, Cutter & Ratinoff as lead counsel is approved. (Waggoner, D) Modified docket text on 9/11/2009 and regenerated NEF to all parties. (Waggoner, D).
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/4/2009 GRANTING 25 Stipulation and Proposed Order; W/in 45 days from the date that the Court appoints a lead plaintiff in this action, such lead plaintiff shall file a further amende d complaint as its Operative Complaint, or designate the most recent complaint on file as its Operative Complaint; W/in 45 days from the date that the Court- appointed lead pltf files or designates its Operative Complaint, dfts shall move, answer or otherwise respond to the Operative Complaint; Dfts shall have no obligation to move, answer or otherwise respond to any complaint in this action until the Operative Complaint is designated or filed by the Court-appointed lead pltf.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/30/2009 GRANTING 17 Motion to Amend the Complaint; The presently scheduled 8/17/2009 hearing on pltf's motion is vacated; and the remainder of the parties' stipulation is not adopted since a portion of it is unclear. (Matson, R) Modified on 7/31/2009 (Matson, R).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
