Ferraro v. State of California et al
Mercurino Ferraro and Estate of Salvatore Ferraro |
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Chief of Corrections of California Department of Correction, Folsom State Prison, Michael Evans, Director of Acute Psychiatry/Custody Health Services, Health Care Program Manager of Folsom State Prison, Mental Health Director of Custody Health Services, J. Schnitzler, Church, Ewing, S. Huey, M. Cho, John C. Fielder, J. Trimble, Classification Officer and Maddalena Ferraro |
2:2009cv01721 |
June 22, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Garland E. Burrell |
John F. Moulds |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 1/13/2011 ORDERING that documents disposing of the case due w/in 60 days; all hearing dates set in this matter and all pending motions are VACATED. (Yin, K) |
Filing 44 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 1/3/2011 ORDERING dfts to file a statement w/in 7 days informing the court which names they redacted in response to discovery requests and the reason(s) for the redactions.(Yin, K) |
Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 04/26/10 ORDERING this case set for Settlement Conference 6/25/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Parties are to appear with full settlement authority. The parties are directed to provide confidential settlement conference statements to Sujean Park, ADR Coordinator, 501 I Street, Suite 4-200, Sacramento, California 95814, so that they arrive no later than June 18, 2010. (Williams, D) |
Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 4/1/10 ORDERING that plaintiffs request for modification to the scheduling order is DENIED withoutprejudice; No later than 4/30/10, the parties shall file a status report to update the court on their mediation efforts; This matter is referred to the courts Alternative Dispute Resolution Coordinator, Sujean Younger, for the scheduling of a mediation; and Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on Sujean Younger. (cc ADR)(Dillon, M) |
Filing 16 ORDER and SCHEDULING ORDER: signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 09/10/09 ordering within 10 days from the date of this order, counsel shall send a letter to the court addressing whether the 10/08/09 hearing on the motion to dismiss is necess ary in light of the filing of the 09/09/09 second amended complaint. Rule 26 initial disclosure shall be stayed until June 2010, following closing of the pleadings. Further status conference is set for 04/01/10 at 11:00 a.m. in courtroom 26 before t he undersigned. Non-expert discovery shall be completed and all motions pertaining to discovery shall be noticed and hear by 11/21/10. Expert Discovery due by 12/21/2010. Rebuttal expert discovery shall be completed by 02/21/11. Dispositive Motion s due by 4/7/2011, Pretrial Conference set for 5/26/2011 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 26 before Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds. Jury Trial set for 8/23/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr... (Plummer, M) Modified on 9/11/2009 (Plummer, M). |
Filing 5 ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 7/7/09: Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for 9/10/2009 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (JFM) before Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds. (Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.