Bair v. Warden, Deuel Vocational Institution et al
| Clifford Bair |
| Warden, Deuel Vocational Institution and Board of Parole Hearings |
| 2:2009cv01730 |
| June 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| John F. Moulds |
| John F. Moulds |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 11/7/11 RECOMMENDING that this action be stayed pending final resolution of the Ex Post Facto Clause claim in Gilman v. Brown, No. 05-cv-0830 LKK GGH (HC); Respondents be requi red to move to lift the stay in this matter within ten days from the date of entry of judgment in the district court in the Gilman action; and Clerk of the Court be directed to administratively close this case. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 1/8/10 ORDERING that the 12/2/09 order to show cause is discharged.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 12/1/09 ORDERING that within 15 days from the date of this order the parties shall show cause in writing, if any they have, why this action should not b e related to Gilman v. Davis, No. 2:08-cv-0830-LKK-GGH (PC); it is RECOMMENDED that 11 MOTION to DISMISS be denied; Respondents be directed to file an answer within 30 days from the date of any order by the district court adopting these findings and recommendations; and petitioners traverse, if any, be due on or before 30 days from the date respondents answer is filed. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due within 10 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 7/7/09 ORDERING that petitioner's 2 request to proceed IFP is GRANTED; respondents to file an answer w/in 45 days; petitioner's traverse due 30 days from answer; the clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (cc: Michael Farrell) (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
