Develder v. Hirshler et al
| Michael Develder |
| J Hirshler, Warden, Deuel Vocation Institution, Director, Department of Corrections, Chief Medical Officer, California State Prison, Sacramento, Warden, California State Prison, Sacramento, Chief Medical Officer, Mule Creek State Prison and R. J. Subia |
| 2:2009cv01803 |
| June 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Amador |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/26/2017 GRANTING 94 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this order is served to file his objections. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
93
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/5/2017 RECOMMENDING 65 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/21/2017 GRANTING 87 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff to file opposition within 30 days from the date this order is served. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/20/2017 VACATING the 2/23/2017 findings and recommendations 76 . Within 21 days, plaintiff shall file a response to the motion for summary judgment. Defendant's reply, if any, is due 7 days after plaintiff's response is docketed on CM/ECF. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
76
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/22/2017 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/24/17 ordering that within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file either an opposition to the motion for summary judgment or as statement of no opposition. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/19/16 Plaintiffs objection, construed as a motion to quash 59 is granted. Defendants subpoena request is limited to medical records from the period of January 2006 to the present. Defendant shall return or destroy any records received that fall outside of this time frame. Plaintiffs request for an extension of time 61 is denied. Plaintiffs motion to compel 63 is granted as to RFP No. 1 to the extent that, within 21 days of the date of this order, defendant shall produce prisoner grievances (and the prisons corresponding responses), based on defendants deliberate indifference to medical needs from January 2005 through December 2009. To the extent such information implicates privacy rights, defendant may redact identifying personal information from responsive documents. In all other respects, the motion is denied. (Plummer, M) Modified on 12/19/2016 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER denying 56 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/13/16. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/23/16 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 1/27/16 53 are ADOPTED in full; and Defendant's MOTION to DISMISS 45 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/27/16 ORDERING that the clerk of the court shall randomly assign a District Judge to this case. U.S. District Judge Troy L. Nunley randomly assigned to this case. Also, RECOMMEENDING that defendant's motion to dismiss 45 be denied. Motion to Dismiss 45 referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/11/2015 DENYING plaintiff's 49 request for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/16/15 ORDERING that 41 Motion for Extension of time. Defendant shall file his response to the complaint on or before April 3, 2015.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/18/14 ORDERING that Service is appropriate for defendant Hirshler; The U.S. Marshal shall personally serve a copy of this order and the amended complaint 36 on defendant J. Hirshler at 73 40 Woodrow Dr., Oakland, California, 94611; Defendant Hirshler shall respond to the complaint within 21 days after service, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12; and Should defendant fail to answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint, plaintiff may again seek default judgment against him.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 09/04/14 denying 32 Motion for Reconsideration. If plaintiff wishes to file an amended complaint as discussed in the order of 06/23/14, he shall do so within 21 days of the service of this order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/23/2014 DENYING 24 & 30 Motions for Default Judgment. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file an amended complaint to allege sufficient facts to state an Eighth Amendment claim again defendant Hirshler within 30 days of service of this order. The US Marshal shall serve a copy of this order on defendant Hirshler. (cc USM-Priority)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/30/2013 GRANTING-IN-PART 24 Motion for default. Defendant Hirshler shall have 21 days from the date of service of this order to request a hearing or otherwise contest the damages sought by pl aintiff in his motion for entry of default. Plaintiff shall have 21 days from the date of this order fo file the affidavit required by 50 U.S.C. App. 521(b)(1). The USM Shall serve a copy of this order and 24 Motion for entry of default on Defendant J. Hirshler. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/8/2012 DISCHARGING the 23 order to show cause, and the court will resolve the motion for default in due course. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/22/2012 ORDERING that, within 21 days, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/10/12 DENYING 21 Motion for default judgment. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/27/12 ORDERING that plaintiff shall, within 30 days of the date of this order, file an appropriate motion based on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and indicate how, or if, he intends to proceed with this lawsuit. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 01/21/11 ORDERING that plaintiffs claims against defendant Housley are dismissed without prejudice. This action now proceeds on plaintiffs claims against defendant Hirshler only. Housley terminated. (Williams, D)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/18/10 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court to mail plaintiff one form USM-285 and a copy of theamended pleading filed April 12, 2010. Within 60 days from the date this order is served, plaintiff may submit the attached Notice of Submission of Documents with a completed form USM-285 providing instructions for service of process upon defendant Housley and two copies of the pleading provided to plaintiff.(Williams, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
