Collins v. Chesapeake Commons Holdings, LLC. et al
Plaintiff: Patricia L. Collins
Defendant: Chesapeake Commons Holdings, LLC. and Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency
Case Number: 2:2009cv01816
Filed: July 1, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Frank C. Damrell
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/3/14 ORDERING that this case is SET for Settlement fefore the Honorable Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/17/2014 in Courtroom No. 27. Initial disclosures under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) should be exchanged within two weeks of the date of this order. The Discovery cut-off is 6/13/2014; Expert disclosures must be made by 6/13/14, with rebuttal experts disclosed by 7/3/14. The expert discovery deadline is 7/31/2014. The Dispositive Mo tion deadline is 8/22/14. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 10/30/2014. The parties should file a joint pretrial statement no later than 10/16/14. The five-day Jury Trial is SET for 12/8/2014, to be finally confirmed at final pretrial conference.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
April 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/23/13 ORDERING that the court imposes an additional sanction of $200 on counsel for defendant Hayes, who is ordered to pay the $700 total to the Clerk of Court within seven days of the date of this order. Failure to comply will result in additional sanctions and a referral to the State Bar, and may result in dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. (Kastilahn, A)
January 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/28/13 ORDERING that counsel for defendant, J. Chauncey Hayes, is sanctioned in the amount of $500, payable to the Clerk of the Court within two weeks of this order.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
November 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Show Cause signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/27/12 ORDERING that Counsel for Defendant is ORDERED to Show Cause on or before 1/11/2013 why Defendant should not be sanctioned, including with default judgment, for failure to prosecute. Defendant shall also file a separate report by 1/11/13. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
March 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/1/2012 ORDERING issues raised in 42 Motion to Vacate are resolved and SHRA's 39 Bill of Costs is DENIED; plaintiff and defendant Chesapeake Commons are directed to file a joint status report within 30 days of the date of this order. (Waggoner, D)
October 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/4/2011 VACATING the jury trial currently set for 10/31/2011; REFERRING this case to VDRP; DIRECTING all parties to file a Status Report within 60 days; DISCHARGING 40 Orders to Show Cause. (cc: VDRP Sacramento) (Michel, G)
August 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/23/11 ORDERING that the final Pretrial Conference is vacated and RESET for 9/19/2011 at 11:00 AM. The parties' joint Pretrial Statement is due no latern than 9/5/11. The parties shall show cause in writing no later than 9/5/2011, why they should not be sanctioned in the amount of $150.00 each for failing to file their Pretrial Statement. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
August 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 38 JUDGMENT signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/22/11 ORDERING that the Plaintiff take nothing, that the Action is DISMISSED on the merits and that defendant Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency recovers its costs. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
August 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/7/11 ADOPTING 35 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING 28 SHRA's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Donati, J)
June 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 35 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 06/28/11 RECOMMENDING that the 28 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted; Objections to these F&Rs due w/i 14 days; referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Benson, A.)
March 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/28/2011 ORDERING 28 SHRA's Motion for Summary Judgment CONTINUED to 5/11/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan; pltf shall show ca use, in writing no later than 4/27/2011, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition; pltf shall file an opposition to the motion, and a response to SHRA's statement of undisputed facts by 4/27/2011; SHRA may file a reply to pltf's opposition, if any by 5/4/2011. (Reader, L)
February 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/15/11 ORDERING the Discovery deadline is CONTINUED to 3/31/2011 for the limited purpose of completing the discovery agreed to by the parties, as set forth herein. This modification does not impact any of the other deadlines set forth in the 9/17/2010 Scheduling Order. (Donati, J)
July 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/1/2010 ORDERING that The July 7, 2010 Status Conference is continued to August 25, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 24. On or before August 11, 2010, defendant Sacram ento Housing and Redevelopment Agency shall file a status report addressing the issues raised in the October 19, 2009 5 order at 3-5. Also on or before July 7, 2010, defendant shall show cause, in writing, why sanctions should not be imposed for i ts failure to comply with the April 9, 2010 order. Plaintiff is not required to file a further status report or a response to defendantsstatus report, but if she elects to do so, any such status report or response to defendant's status report s hall be filed on or before August 18, 2010. Failure of defendant Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a recommendation for entry of default against defendant. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Chesapeake Commons Holding LLC at 3600 Data Drive, Rancho Cordova, California 95670.(Duong, D)
April 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/9/2010 ORDERING that the Status Conference is CONTINUED to 7/7/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Parties shall file a joint status report by 6/23/2010. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the USM. Within 14 days, the USM shall serve dft Chesapeake Commons Holdings, LLC with a copy of this order. (cc: USM) (Engbretson, K.)
January 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/22/10: Initial Scheduling Conference RESET for 4/14/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal. (cc:USM) (Kaminski, H)
October 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/19/09 ORDERING that The Clerk of Court is directed to issue summons forthwith. The Clerk of Court shall send plaintiff two USM-285 forms, one summons, a copy of the file endorsed complaint, t his courts "Order Requiring Joint Status Report," and the forms providing notice of the magistrate judge's availability to exercise jurisdiction for all purposes, and the courts voluntary dispute resolution program. Plaintiff shall su pply the United States Marshal, within 15 days from the date this order is filed, all information needed by the Marshal to effect service of process, and shall, within 10 days thereafter, file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal shall serve process, with copies of this court's status order and related documents, within 90 days of receipt of the required information from plaintiff. The Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal. (cc USM). (Duong, D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Collins v. Chesapeake Commons Holdings, LLC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia L. Collins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chesapeake Commons Holdings, LLC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?