Lopez v. Hubbard, et al
| Kenneth Lopez |
| Sue Hubbard, G Rodriguez, E. Arnold, Roseanne Campbell, Silvia H Garcia, N. Grannis, D.L. Porter, M. - Hill and G. Rapoza |
| 2:2009cv01928 |
| July 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/06/10 ordering the court's 09/30/10 findings and recommendations 71 are convereted into an order and defendants' motion for summary judgment 54 is granted. Defendant Campbell is dismissed from this action. Judgment shall be entered in favor of defendants.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
71
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/29/10 recommending that 54 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and this case be closed. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 08/20/10 ordering plaintiff's 03/22/10 motion to compel 37 is denied. Plaintiff's motion for an extension 64 is granted and his opposition to summary judgment is deemed timely filed. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 8/6/2010 ADOPTING 56 Findings and Recommendations in full. Dft's 46 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Dft Garcia is DISMISSED from this action. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/21/10 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations 53 are adopted in full; and the 3/19/10, motion to dismiss 34 filed by defendant Porter is granted. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/29/2010 ORDERING that the 48 findings and recommendations filed May 12, 2010, are adopted in full. Defendant Rapoza is dismissed from this action.(Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER denying 55 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 06/21/10. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
56
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/15/2010 RECOMMENDING that dft's 46 motion to dismiss be granted. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
53
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 06/03/10 recommending that the 03/19/10 motion to dismiss filed by defendant Porter be granted. MOTION to DISMISS 34 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 5/27/10, adopting in full 40 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Dft Grannis is DISMISSED with prejudice.(Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
48
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 05/12/10 recommending that defendant Rapoza be dismissed from this action. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
40
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/2/10 RECOMMENDING that defendant Grannis be dismissed with prejudice. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/29/10 GRANTING 17 Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend. Any amended complaint shall be filed within 28 days from the filed date of this order.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
20
DISCOVERY and SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/23/09: Discovery due by 3/19/2010; All Pretrial Motions, except motions to compel discovery, due by 6/11/2010; Pretrial Conference and Trial dates will be set, as appropriate.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/4/09 DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT SERVICE DOCUMENTS and USM-285 Forms. Clerk to send plaintiff: 1 Summons, 1 USM-285 Form, and 1 copy of the Complaint filed on 7/15/09. Within 60 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete and submit the Notice of Submission of Documents to the court, with the appropriate documents.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/20/09 ordering the clerk of the court shall send plaintiff 2 USM-285 forms, instruction sheet and a copy of the 07/15/09 complaint to be completed and returned within 60 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DIRECTING USM to serve * Complaint * filed on * 7/15/09,* on * G. Rapoza, Sue Hubbard, G Rodriguez, E. Arnold, Roseanne Campbell, Silvia H Garcia, N. Grannis, D.L. Porter, M. - Hill*, signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/31/09. Wi thin ten days from the date of this order, the United States Marshal is directed to notify defendants of the commencement of this action and to request a waiver of service of summons. The Clerk of the Court shall serve upon plaintiff a copy of the Local Rules of Court. (cc USM)(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Kenneth Lopez signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/29/09. CDC is to collect monthly payments and fwd to the Clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of pltf's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial w/ a copy of this order. (cc: CDC, Financial)(Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
