Durand et al v. Stephenson et al
Plaintiff: Edwin Durand and Madelaine Durand
Defendant: Candice L. Stephenson, J. Wayne Strauch and Stonehouse Court Associates, LLC
Case Number: 2:2009cv02038
Filed: July 23, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 162 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/17/13 DENYING 158 Motion for Reconsideration; and DENYING 159 Motion to Shorten Time. (Meuleman, A)
May 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 157 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/17/13 ORDERING for the reasons set forth above, Plaintiffs' motion for a new trial is DENIED, and Plaintiffs' motion to amend the judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs are entitled to prejudgment interest at an interest rate of 7% from the date of conversion, 4/18/08, until the date judgment was entered, 2/6/13. (Becknal, R)
February 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 141 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/6/13 VACATING and REVERSING 72 Order. The Clerk of Court is ORDERED to return to Plaintiffs any money already paid pursuant to the Sanction Order. (cc: Financial). (Meuleman, A)
February 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 137 MINUTE ORDER by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/6/2013 DIRECTING the clerk to SEAL 70 Notice. (Donati, J)
November 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 91 AMENDED PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/27/12: The parties estimate three (3) to four (4) court days for trial. Trial will commence on January 14, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. (Kaminski, H)
November 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 87 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/19/12 ORDERING that the Jury Trial is SET for 1/14/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. The parties estimate three to four court days for trial. (Kastilahn, A)
October 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER denying 73 Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay, signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/29/12. (Kastilahn, A)
October 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 72 AMENDED ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/1/12 ORDERING that under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(c)(4), the court finds a sanction requiring plaintiffs to pay $5,000. Plaintiffs shall accordingly pay to the Clerk of Court $5,000. Payment of said sum may be paid in monthly installments of $500 for ten months, with the first installment to be made no later than 10/31/2012. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the court's financial department. Plaintiffs are cautioned that failure to comply with this order may result in contempt proceedings. (Kastilahn, A)
September 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/28/12 ORDERING that the court finds a sanction requiring plaintiffs to pay $5,000. Plaintiffs shall accordingly pay to the court's nonappropriated fund $5,000. Payment of said sum may be paid in monthly installments of $500 for ten months, with the first installment to be made no later than 10/31/2012. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the court's financial department. Plaintiffs are cautioned that failure to comply with this order may result in contempt proceedings. (Kastilahn, A)
August 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/22/2012. No later than 9/14/2012, plaintiffs shall submit a Declaration setting forth specific information regarding wages and income. The issue of amount for sanctions to be imposed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 will thereafter stand SUBMITTED. (Marciel, M)
July 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 07/24/12 ORDERING that plaintiffs' reply re: motion for relief is due by 08/13/12. (Benson, A.)
June 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/28/12: November 16, 2010 order sanctioning plaintiffs in the amount of $10,056.20 is vacated 51 . Defendant may file a response to plaintiff's motion for relief no later than August 6, 2012. Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/16/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. Jury Trial set for 1/14/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Kaminski, H)
November 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/16/2010 ORDERING under FRCP 11(c)(4), the Court finds a sanction requiring plaintiffs to pay $10,056.20 will be sufficient, and not more sever than reasonably necessary, to deter repetit ion of the conduct the Court found objectionable in its 9/29/10 order. Plaintiffs shall pay to the Court's nonappropriated fund $10,056.20, no later than 2/1/2011; Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on Court's financial department; plaintiffs are cautioned that failure to comply with this order shall result in contempt proceedings. (cc: financial)(Waggoner, D)
September 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 09/28/10 ORDERING defendants' motion to strike declaration and letter is DENIED; motion to strike the Van Tessel declaration is GRANTED. RECOMMENDING that defendants' motion to dismiss be DENIED; defendants' alternative motion for summary judgment be GRANTED; and this action be CLOSED. (Williams, D)
August 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/20/2010 ORDERING that no later than August 27, 2010, plaintiffs shall submit for in camera review unredacted versions of plaintiffs' 37 Exhibits one, six, seven, and nine and the e-mail attached as Exhibit A to Defendants 39 Reply.(Duong, D)
July 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/14/2010. No later that 8/6/2010: 1) plaintiffs shall SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why conduct their has not violated FRCP 11(b); 2) they shall file competent evidence establishing aut henticity of Noble Murry appraisal dated February 2006; and 3) defendant shall submit complete copies of deposition transcripts of all parties to this action. Upon receipt of plaintiffs' submission under this Order, Court will determine whether an Evidentiary Hearing shall be set.(Marciel, M)
April 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 04/29/10 ORDERING that plf's 16 Motion to Compel the first set of discovery propounded by plfs is MOOT. Any dispute regarding discovery propounded on 04/02/10 is unripe. The motion to com pel responses to the second set of interrogatories and production of documents accordingly is DENIED w/o prejudice. The parties have stipulated that the deposition of dft Strauch shall take place on 05/03/10 in Roseville, CA. The parties may contact the courtroom deputy for the undersigned to arrange for a telephonic conference to resolve any disputes arising during the deposition. The motion to compel further deposition of defendant Stephenson is DENIED. (Benson, A.)
December 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/16/09 ORDERING that Initial disclosures shall be made no later than 12/30/2009. Discovery, including the hearing of discovery motions, shall be completed by 5/5/2010. Dispositive Motions shal l be notieced to be heard by 6/16/2010. The Pretrial Conference set for 7/21/2010 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. Trial is SET for 9/20/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Durand et al v. Stephenson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edwin Durand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Madelaine Durand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Candice L. Stephenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Wayne Strauch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stonehouse Court Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?